ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Determinantes del riesgo hemorrágico en pacientes anticoagulados en atención primaria: estudio observacional retrospectivo
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Determinantes del riesgo hemorrágico en…

Determinantes del riesgo hemorrágico en pacientes anticoagulados en atención primaria: estudio observacional retrospectivo

Atención Primaria·September 15Open Access
Primary Health CareLimited evidenceAtrial FibrillationChronic Kidney DiseaseHemorrhageRetrospective Observational StudyAnticoagulantDirect Oral AnticoagulantVitamin K AntagonistOlder Adult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This retrospective observational study examined clinical and therapeutic factors associated with clinically relevant bleeding (per ISTH criteria) in 1,377 anticoagulated adults (VKA or DOAC) followed in primary care centers in Badalona, Spain, during 2024.

Key findings

Bleeding occurred in 29 patients (2.1%; 95% CI: 1.5–3.0). In multivariable analysis (n=986 complete cases), only age was independently associated with bleeding (adjusted OR 1.08 per year; 95% CI: 1.02–1.14; p=0.006). Patients who bled were older (83.9 vs 76.3 years), had lower eGFR (57.6 vs 68.1 ml/min/1.73m²), more CKD (56.0% vs 32.6%), and more hospital admissions (0.91 vs 0.25).

Study limitations

Only 29 bleeding events occurred, making the logistic regression underpowered and results exploratory. Renal function data were incomplete, restricting full multivariable analysis to 986 of 1,377 patients. The single-year, single-network retrospective design limits generalizability.

Clinical implications

In anticoagulated primary care patients, increasing age is the strongest independent predictor of clinically relevant bleeding—each additional year raises the odds by ~8%. Clinicians should apply heightened vigilance and individualized risk-benefit reassessment for older anticoagulated patients, particularly those with CKD or frequent hospitalizations.

Caveats

  • Only 29 bleeding events were recorded, making all multivariate findings exploratory and statistically fragile—results should not be used to draw definitive conclusions about independent risk factors
  • Renal function data were missing for a substantial portion of the cohort (391 of 1,377 patients excluded from complete-case analysis), which may introduce selection bias
  • The study population is predominantly older adults with atrial fibrillation from a single Spanish primary care network; findings may not generalize to other settings or anticoagulation indications

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What bleeding risk scores are most accurate for anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation in primary care?How does chronic kidney disease affect bleeding risk in patients on direct oral anticoagulants?Should anticoagulation be continued or stopped in elderly patients with high bleeding risk and atrial fibrillation?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Atención Primaria
Sample Size
n=1,377
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next