ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Endothelial Cell Transcriptomics Reveal…

Endothelial Cell Transcriptomics Reveal Activation of Ribosomal-related Pathways in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Archivos de Bronconeumología·September 18Open Access
Respiratory SystemPractice changingChronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary HypertensionPulmonary Arterial HypertensionTranslational/Experimental StudySoluble Guanylate Cyclase StimulatorAdultAdempasRiociguat

Summary

View source

What was studied

Transcriptomic and functional profiling of endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs) from PAH patients, CTEPH patients, and healthy controls to identify disease-specific molecular alterations, including the effect of riociguat on CTEPH-ECFC abnormalities.

Key findings

CTEPH-ECFCs showed a unique upregulation of ribosomal and translation-related genes with increased global protein synthesis, mitochondrial remodelling, increased ER-mitochondria contacts (MAMs), altered intracellular Ca²⁺ handling, and reduced maximal respiratory capacity — a profile distinct from PAH-ECFCs; riociguat did not reverse these abnormalities.

Study limitations

ECFCs are circulating surrogate cells and may not fully reflect the transcriptomic state of pulmonary vascular endothelium in situ; sample sizes for rare disease groups are likely small; the study is observational/translational without in vivo validation of the identified pathways.

Clinical implications

CTEPH has a distinct molecular signature — a translation-mitochondria-MAM axis — that riociguat does not correct, suggesting that approved soluble guanylate cyclase–targeted therapy may be insufficient and that disease-specific pathways (ribosomal/translational) warrant investigation as therapeutic targets in inoperable or persistent CTEPH.

Caveats

  • As a rare disease study, sample sizes per group are likely small, which may limit statistical power and generalizability
  • The study uses circulating endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs) as surrogates for pulmonary vascular endothelium; findings may not directly translate to the disease site in the pulmonary vasculature
  • This is a mechanistic/translational study without a clinical outcomes endpoint; the therapeutic implications of targeting the ribosomal-translational axis are speculative at this stage

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the molecular differences between PAH and CTEPH endothelial cells?Riociguat efficacy in inoperable or persistent CTEPH after pulmonary endarterectomyRibosomal pathway dysregulation in pulmonary vascular remodelling

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Archivos de Bronconeumología
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next