ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Influence of national socioeconomic stat…

Influence of national socioeconomic status on treatment retention and disease activity in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: evidence over 2 years in 13 European countries

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases·July 13
RheumatologyPractice changingAxial SpondyloarthritisPsoriatic ArthritisLongitudinal Cohort StudyBiologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic DrugTargeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic DrugAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This study examined how national socioeconomic indicators (GDP per capita, HDI, gross national income, health expenditure, out-of-pocket expenditure) relate to b/tsDMARD treatment retention at 6, 12, and 24 months and disease activity at treatment initiation in 38,911 patients with PsA (n=17,296) or axSpA (n=21,615) across 13 European countries from 2015–2021.

Key findings

Higher national wealth was paradoxically associated with **earlier** b/tsDMARD discontinuation — retention was significantly lower in high-GDP countries vs. medium/low-GDP countries at 6, 12, and 24 months (log-rank P<.001 for all). Conversely, patients in lower-GDP countries started treatment with **worse disease activity**, especially in PsA. The strongest socioeconomic effects on retention were seen with GDP per capita and HDI, and were most pronounced in women with axSpA.

Study limitations

- Country-level (ecological) socioeconomic indicators were used rather than individual patient-level socioeconomic data, limiting causal inference. - Registry data may reflect variation in prescribing practices, access policies, and drug availability across countries rather than purely socioeconomic effects. - The 2015–2021 timeframe may not reflect more recent changes in drug access or health policy across Europe.

Clinical implications

In lower-income European countries, patients with PsA and axSpA tend to start biologics with higher disease burden and stay on them longer — possibly due to restricted switching options rather than better drug performance. Clinicians and health policy makers in these settings should actively monitor disease activity at treatment initiation and ensure timely access to treatment optimization.

Caveats

  • Age distribution of the cohort is not specified in the abstract; 'adult' age group is assumed based on typical spondyloarthritis registry populations.
  • No specific biologic or targeted synthetic agents are named in the abstract; brand and generic drug tags could not be assigned.
  • The 'practice_changing' impact flag is applied with caution — while findings are novel and policy-relevant, the ecological study design limits direct clinical translation at the individual patient level.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does national healthcare spending affect biologic drug switching rates in spondyloarthritis?What factors predict early discontinuation of biologics in psoriatic arthritis across different countries?How does disease activity at biologic initiation differ between high- and low-income countries in inflammatory arthritis?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Sample Size
n=38,911
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next