ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Prognostic role of thymidine kinase 1 activity in hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Prognostic role of thymidine kinase 1 ac…

Prognostic role of thymidine kinase 1 activity in hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis

The Breast·September 9Open Access
Obstetrics & GynecologyPractice changingHormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast CancerSystematic Review And Meta-AnalysisBiomarker (Circulating Thymidine Kinase 1 Activity)Adult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the prognostic value of circulating thymidine kinase 1 activity (TKa) — measured at baseline and on-treatment (weeks 2 and 4) — in women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), pooling hazard ratios for PFS and OS from 18 studies (~3,000 patients).

Key findings

High baseline TKa was associated with significantly worse PFS (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.57–2.30) and OS (HR 2.48; 95% CI 1.94–3.17). On-treatment TKa also remained prognostic: at 2 weeks (PFS HR 2.76; 95% CI 2.34–3.26) and at 4 weeks (PFS HR 2.26; 95% CI 1.93–2.66), all p < 0.001.

Study limitations

- Results were heterogeneous across included studies (I² reported; prediction intervals used, but residual heterogeneity likely from variable TKa cut-offs and assay types). - Only 15 of 18 studies could be meta-analyzed, limiting completeness. - Evidence is restricted to women; generalizability to other sexes or HR-negative subtypes is unknown.

Clinical implications

Consider measuring circulating TKa before and early during treatment in HR+ MBC — high TKa at baseline or within the first 4 weeks signals a substantially higher risk of progression and death, and may serve as an early indicator of treatment resistance. Standardization of cut-offs and assay methods is still needed before routine clinical adoption.

Caveats

  • Heterogeneity across studies was noted but specific I² values were not reported in the abstract; readers should consult the full text for subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
  • Sample size is reported as 'nearly 3000' — exact N is not stated; value_numeric set to 3000 as a conservative approximation.
  • The impact_flag 'practice_changing' reflects the strength of the pooled findings, but authors note that cut-off and assay standardization is still required before routine use — clinical adoption may be premature.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the clinical utility of thymidine kinase 1 as a liquid biopsy marker in breast cancer?How does early on-treatment biomarker change predict outcomes in metastatic breast cancer?Which circulating biomarkers best predict treatment resistance in HR-positive metastatic breast cancer?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Breast
Sample Size
n=3,000
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next