Pediatric instant noodle burns: A ten-year single center retrospective study
Clinical Summary
View sourceWhat was studied
Ten-year single-center retrospective review of pediatric (<18 years) scald burn admissions (2010–2020) comparing instant noodle burns with other scalds.
Key findings
Instant noodle burns accounted for 245/790 (31%) admissions; compared with other scalds, children were older (5.4 vs 3.8 years), more often unsupervised (37% vs 21%), more likely Black/African American (90.6% vs 75.2%), and from lower childhood opportunity index areas (9.9 vs 14.6). Burns were smaller (3.6% vs 5.8% TBSA), required fewer operations (29% vs 41%), had shorter LOS (4.2 vs 6.4 days), with similar adjusted LOS (1.7 vs 1.5 days/%TBSA) and complications (10% vs 15%).
Study limitations
Single-center retrospective review of admitted patients only, limiting generalizability and excluding non-admitted scald burns.
Clinical implications
Instant noodle burns are a common share of pediatric scald admissions and, though smaller, still often need hospitalization and surgery; prevention should focus on supervision and safe handling in communities with lower opportunity indices.
Related Questions
Explore related topics and deepen your understanding