ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Temporal analyses of immune responses in…

Temporal analyses of immune responses in sepsis reveal asynchrony between clinical stage of illness and immune states

Immunity·August 28Open Access
ImmunologyPractice changingSepsisSeptic ShockProspective Observational Cohort StudyAnthracyclineCorticosteroidIL-6 Receptor AntagonistIron ChelatorJAK InhibitorAdultDeferasiroxDexamethasoneDoxorubicinHydrocortisoneImatinibTocilizumab

Summary

View source

What was studied

This proof-of-concept cohort study (IMMERSE) enrolled 69 critically ill adults with sepsis and 30 elective cardiac surgery patients, sampling longitudinal peripheral blood transcriptomics (pan-leukocyte RNA-seq), mass cytometry (CyTOF), flow cytometry, and plasma cytokines at up to four time points from ICU admission through discharge or death, to map immune response trajectories rather than single-timepoint subtypes.

Key findings

Pseudotime analysis of 718 differentially expressed genes identified three Sepsis Temporal Immune States (STImS1–3): STImS1 (n=44 samples) was innate-immune-dominant with highest IL-6, mortality-associated gene signatures, and lowest immune resilience; STImS3 (n=60) was adaptive-immune-dominant with improving resilience; all three STImS appeared at every clinical time point, demonstrating that immune state and clinical time are partially decoupled. STImS explained 32.8% of transcriptomic variance vs. 1.04% for age and 0.19% for sex. Hospital mortality was 15% (10/69), with non-survivors most enriched in STImS1 (39%) and least in STImS3 (20%).

Study limitations

- Transcriptome derivation used only 198 samples from a single center; external validation relied on mapping to existing public datasets rather than a prospective replication cohort. - No STImS classifier model was developed, limiting immediate clinical application. - Sampling began at clinical sepsis recognition, so pre-sepsis immune responses during the infection-to-sepsis transition were not captured.

Clinical implications

Clinical time point (e.g., ICU admission = 'early sepsis') does not reliably reflect a patient's actual immune state — some admitted patients are already in late immune states, and some 'recovered' patients remain in early states. Before enrolling patients in immunomodulatory trials or initiating targeted therapies (e.g., IL-6 blockade, JAK inhibitors, corticosteroids), aligning treatment to the patient's immune trajectory state rather than clinical time may improve outcomes.

Caveats

  • Impact flag 'practice_changing' was applied because the study conceptually reframes how immune time and clinical time are coupled in sepsis — however, no direct patient outcome benefit from STImS-guided therapy has yet been demonstrated in a trial.
  • STImS were validated in existing public datasets, but no prospective external validation cohort was used; generalizability across different ICU settings, pathogens, and healthcare systems is uncertain.
  • The paper is dated August 28, 2026, which is within days of the current date; peer review and post-publication scrutiny are ongoing.
Show all 4
  • The sample size of n=99 participants (69 sepsis, 30 cardiac surgery) is small for a transcriptomic trajectory study; findings are exploratory and proof-of-concept. Broader validation in diverse populations is needed before clinical implementation.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does immune state trajectory differ from transcriptomic subtypes like SRS1/SRS2 in guiding sepsis immunotherapy?What is the evidence for IL-6 blockade or JAK inhibitors in early innate-dominant sepsis?How can pseudotime analysis of bulk RNA-seq be used to track immune recovery in critically ill patients?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Immunity
Sample Size
n=99
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next