ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
2026 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. 2026 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Qu…

2026 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

JACC·August 17
Cardiac & Cardiovascular SystemsPractice changingAtrial FibrillationAtrial FlutterHeart Failure With Reduced Ejection FractionStrokeClinical Performance Measure / Consensus StatementAntiarrhythmic DrugCatheter AblationDirect Oral AnticoagulantVitamin K AntagonistAdultApixabanDabigatranDofetilideDronedaroneEdoxabanFlecainidePropafenoneRivaroxabanWarfarin

Summary

View source

What was studied

The 2026 AHA/ACC writing committee developed a comprehensive AF performance and quality measure set — 5 performance measures (suitable for public reporting/pay-for-performance) and 16 quality measures (for local quality improvement) — derived from Class 1 or 3 recommendations in the 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS AF Guideline, covering newly diagnosed AF evaluation, anticoagulation, rhythm/rate control, catheter ablation, and health equity.

Key findings

The final set includes 21 measures: 5 performance measures (PM-1 through PM-5) targeting basic clinical evaluation, secondary prevention, stroke risk documentation, DOAC prescribing, and post-PCI antithrombotic therapy; and 16 quality measures (QM-1 through QM-16) covering equity, LAA exclusion during surgery, antithrombotic safety, shared decision-making, antiarrhythmic drug safety, catheter ablation use, and HFrEF-specific rhythm control.

Study limitations

- This is a guideline-derived consensus document, not an empirical study; no patient-level outcomes data are reported. - Many quality measures are not yet ready for public reporting due to feasibility gaps, evolving evidence, or difficulty measuring adherence with existing data systems. - Equity measure (QM-1) acknowledges that multiple dimensions of disparity make uniform implementation difficult.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should document a validated stroke risk score at least annually, prescribe DOACs when indicated (preferring DOACs over warfarin for non-valvular AF), offer shared decision-making on rhythm vs. rate control, and refer eligible patients with HFrEF and AF for catheter ablation — gaps that this measure set directly targets. Health systems should track AF care delivery by race/ethnicity, sex, and social determinants of health to identify and close persistent equity gaps in anticoagulation, rhythm control, and ablation referral.

Caveats

  • Study design classification is ambiguous; this is best described as a professional society performance measure set derived from guideline recommendations, not a traditional research study design.
  • The 'impact_flag' of practice_changing reflects the scope of new and revised measures introduced (3 new PMs, 14 new QMs), but real-world implementation impact has not yet been measured.
  • This is a consensus/performance measure document, not a clinical trial — no sample size or patient-level outcomes are reported; level of evidence reflects document type rather than a primary study.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

Which patients with AF and HFrEF benefit most from catheter ablation over medical therapy?How should I choose between rate control and rhythm control in a patient with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation?What are the recommended anticoagulation strategies for AF patients with severe chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
JACC
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next