ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Dupilumab efficacy and safety in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Dupilumab efficacy and safety in patient…

Dupilumab efficacy and safety in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology·September 4Open Access
AllergyPractice changingAllergic Bronchopulmonary AspergillosisAsthmaRandomized Controlled TrialIL-4/IL-13 Receptor AntagonistMixedDupixentDupilumab

Summary

View source

What was studied

This double-blind phase 2 RCT evaluated dupilumab (IL-4/IL-13 blockade) vs. placebo in patients aged ≥12 years with asthma and ABPA over 24–52 weeks; 37.1% were on chronic systemic corticosteroids (SCS) at baseline (dupilumab n=35, placebo n=27).

Key findings

At week 24, dupilumab significantly improved prebronchodilator FEV1 vs. placebo (LS mean change +0.203 L vs. +0.002 L; difference +0.201 L; 95% CI 0.08–0.33; P=0.002). Severe respiratory exacerbation rates were reduced by 55.2% (0.695 vs. 1.551 per person-year; nominal P=0.0627). Among SCS-dependent patients, 71.4% on dupilumab vs. 14.3% on placebo were SCS-free by week 24.

Study limitations

- Small sample size (n=62 total) limits power, especially for the exacerbation endpoint (nominal P=0.0627, not statistically significant). - Phase 2 trial only; larger confirmatory trials are needed before regulatory approval. - Variable treatment duration (24–52 weeks) may introduce heterogeneity in longer-term outcomes.

Clinical implications

For patients with asthma complicated by ABPA — especially those on chronic steroids — dupilumab meaningfully improved lung function and enabled SCS discontinuation in most treated patients. Clinicians should consider dupilumab as a promising option for this difficult-to-treat population while awaiting phase 3 data and regulatory approval.

Caveats

  • Age group tagged as 'mixed' because the trial enrolled patients ≥12 years, spanning adolescents and adults.
  • Impact flag 'practice_changing' applied provisionally — this is a phase 2 trial with no currently approved therapies for ABPA, but phase 3 confirmation is still pending.
  • The exacerbation rate reduction (55.2%) did not reach conventional statistical significance (nominal P=0.0627), so this endpoint should be interpreted with caution.
Show all 4
  • Total sample size of n=62 is inferred from dupilumab (n=35) + placebo (n=27); the abstract does not explicitly state a total N.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What biologic therapies are available or in trials for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA)?How does dupilumab compare to antifungal therapy or systemic corticosteroids in managing ABPA?Can dupilumab reduce steroid dependence in severe asthma with type 2 inflammation?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Sample Size
n=62
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next