ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Final Biomarker and Efficacy Analyses of Lorlatinib in Patients With ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Phase 2 Study
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Final Biomarker and Efficacy Analyses of…

Final Biomarker and Efficacy Analyses of Lorlatinib in Patients With ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Phase 2 Study

Journal of Thoracic Oncology·September 17
Respiratory SystemPractice changingNon-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 2 Clinical TrialALK Tyrosine Kinase InhibitorAdultLorbrenaLorlatinib

Summary

View source

What was studied

This phase 2 study evaluated biomarker correlates (ALK fusion subtypes, co-mutations, ctDNA) of clinical outcomes with lorlatinib across treatment-naive (EXP1), prior crizotinib (EXP2-3A), and prior second-generation ALK TKI (EXP3B-5) cohorts in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC, with 5 years of follow-up.

Key findings

EML4::ALK variant 3 (by ctDNA) was associated with shorter OS in the EXP2-3A cohort but not in EXP1 or EXP3B-5; TP53 co-mutation was linked to shorter OS across all cohorts; acquired ALK resistance mutations emerged in EXP2-3A and EXP3B-5 but not in treatment-naive patients (EXP1, n=8).

Study limitations

Matched paired ctDNA sample sizes were small (EXP1 n=8, EXP2-3A n=17), limiting biomarker subgroup analyses; ctDNA detection rates may not fully capture tumor heterogeneity; findings are from a single-arm phase 2 study without a comparator arm.

Clinical implications

TP53 co-mutation and EML4::ALK variant 3 (in post-crizotinib patients) identify higher-risk subgroups, but lorlatinib still showed substantial activity and prolonged OS across all biomarker subgroups. Treatment-naive patients treated with lorlatinib do not appear to develop ALK resistance mutations, suggesting non-ALK mechanisms drive resistance in that setting.

Caveats

  • Biomarker subgroup analyses are limited by small paired ctDNA sample sizes, particularly in the treatment-naive cohort (n=8), which constrains the reliability of resistance mechanism conclusions
  • The EXP3B-5 cohort is heterogeneous, including patients with one or more prior second-generation ALK TKIs with or without chemotherapy, which may confound outcome comparisons
  • This is a single-arm phase 2 study; absence of a randomized comparator limits causal inference for biomarker-outcome associations

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the resistance mechanisms to lorlatinib in treatment-naive ALK-positive NSCLC?How does TP53 co-mutation affect outcomes with ALK TKI therapy in advanced NSCLC?EML4-ALK fusion variant 3 prognosis and treatment outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Sample Size
n=64
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next