ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. A phase 2 study of encorafenib in combin…

A phase 2 study of encorafenib in combination with binimetinib for Chinese participants with BRAFV600E mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: Results from the OCEAN II study

Lung Cancer·August 13Open Access
Respiratory SystemConfirms priorBRAF V600E-Mutated Metastatic NSCLCNon-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 2 Single-Arm TrialBRAF InhibitorMEK InhibitorAdultBraftoviMektoviBinimetinibEncorafenib

Summary

View source

What was studied

Phase 2 trial (OCEAN II) evaluating encorafenib (450 mg daily) plus binimetinib (90 mg daily total) in 63 Chinese patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic unresectable stage IV NSCLC, including both treatment-naïve and previously treated patients (excluding prior BRAF/MEK inhibitors). Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (safety lead-in) and confirmed objective response rate by independent central review (pivotal part).

Key findings

Confirmed ORR by independent central review was 61% (95% CI 47–74%) in the ad hoc analysis; disease control rate 87% (95% CI 75–95%). Median time-to-response was 1.8 months, median duration of response 17.5 months, median PFS 13.8 months, and median OS 27.9 months. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55.6% of patients; 14.3% discontinued any drug due to adverse events.

Study limitations

Single-arm design with no comparator group limits causal inference. The study enrolled only Chinese patients, so generalizability to other ethnic populations is uncertain. Ad hoc efficacy analysis was unplanned, and the upper bound of the PFS confidence interval was not estimable.

Clinical implications

Encorafenib plus binimetinib yields a ~61% confirmed response rate and nearly 14-month median PFS in Chinese patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic NSCLC, with a safety profile consistent with prior global data. Clinicians treating this population should be prepared to manage Grade ≥3 toxicities in over half of patients, though discontinuation rates remain relatively low (~14%).

Caveats

  • Brand names for encorafenib (Braftovi) and binimetinib (Mektovi) were inferred from known proprietary names, as they are not explicitly stated in the source text.
  • Overall survival upper confidence interval (30.0 months) suggests the OS data may not be fully mature at the time of reporting.
  • The pivotal-part primary efficacy analysis covered the first 50 participants, while the ad hoc analysis included all 63; clinicians should note the unplanned nature of the larger analysis.
Show all 4
  • The study population is exclusively Chinese patients; distinct genomic or disease characteristics noted by the authors may limit direct extrapolation to other ethnic groups.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the efficacy of encorafenib plus binimetinib in BRAF V600E-mutated non-small cell lung cancer?How does BRAF V600E mutation frequency and prognosis differ in Chinese versus Western NSCLC patients?What are the recommended management strategies for Grade 3 or higher toxicities with BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations in lung cancer?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Lung Cancer
Sample Size
n=63
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next