ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Daily low-dose carboplatin or weekly car…

Daily low-dose carboplatin or weekly carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel for concurrent chemoradiotherapy in older patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG1914): A randomized phase 3 trial

Lung Cancer·August 14Open Access
Respiratory SystemConfirms priorLocally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung CancerNon-Small Cell Lung CancerRandomized Controlled TrialChemoradiotherapyPD-L1 InhibitorPlatinum ChemotherapyTaxaneOlder AdultAbraxaneImfinziCarboplatinDurvalumabNab-Paclitaxel

Summary

View source

What was studied

This open-label randomized phase 3 trial (JCOG1914) compared daily low-dose carboplatin (30 mg/m²) vs. weekly carboplatin (AUC 2) plus nab-paclitaxel (30 mg/m²), each with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy and optional durvalumab maintenance, in patients aged ≥75 years with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC across 38 Japanese institutions (December 2020–March 2024).

Key findings

The trial was stopped early for futility: Bayesian predictive probability of non-inferiority for carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel was only 8.0%. Median OS was not reached in the carboplatin-alone arm vs. 26.1 months in the combination arm (HR 1.56; 95% CI 0.79–3.11; p=0.200). The carboplatin-alone arm also had significantly better quality of life at 6 weeks (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.18–0.81; p=0.012). Two treatment-related deaths and seven non-cancer-related deaths occurred in the combination arm.

Study limitations

- Trial stopped early for futility with only 124 patients enrolled, limiting statistical power for definitive OS conclusions. - Single-country (Japan) study population may limit generalizability. - Median OS was not yet reached in the control arm, making survival comparisons preliminary.

Clinical implications

For patients aged ≥75 with unresectable LA-NSCLC, daily low-dose carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy remains the standard of care — adding weekly nab-paclitaxel did not improve survival and worsened quality of life. Clinicians should not adopt the carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel regimen in this older population.

Caveats

  • The non-inferiority design means the study was not powered to detect superiority; the HR of 1.56 trending against the combination arm should be noted clinically even though p=0.200.
  • The study was conducted exclusively in Japan (≥75 years), which may limit applicability to other ethnic groups or health systems with different treatment thresholds for older adults.
  • Trial was terminated early for futility after interim analysis; final OS data are immature (median not reached in control arm), so survival estimates should be interpreted cautiously.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the standard chemoradiotherapy regimen for elderly patients with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC?Does durvalumab maintenance benefit older patients after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for NSCLC?How does nab-paclitaxel compare to standard paclitaxel in concurrent chemoradiation for lung cancer?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Lung Cancer
Sample Size
n=124
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next