ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Evaluation, etiology, and management of gross hematuria following radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Evaluation, etiology, and management of…

Evaluation, etiology, and management of gross hematuria following radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations·August 21
Urology & NephrologySafety signalBladder CancerCancer RecurrenceGross HematuriaRetrospective Cohort StudyUrinary Diversion SurgeryOlder Adult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This retrospective study evaluated the etiology, workup, and management of gross hematuria in 21 patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) and orthotopic neobladder (ONB) urinary diversion between 2017 and 2021 and later required cystoscopy for gross hematuria.

Key findings

Nearly 1 in 4 patients (23.8%, n=5) had cancer recurrence as the cause—4 urethral and 1 upper tract—with a median time from cystectomy to hematuria of 29 months (IQR 15–36). Other causes included pouchitis (23.8%), anticoagulation-related bleeding (9.5%), and undetermined etiology in 42.9% despite full workup.

Study limitations

Very small cohort (n=21) from a single center limits generalizability. Nearly 43% of cases had no identified cause, suggesting diagnostic gaps. Retrospective design introduces potential selection and ascertainment bias.

Clinical implications

Gross hematuria after radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder should prompt thorough evaluation—including cystoscopy and upper tract imaging—since cancer recurrence accounts for roughly 1 in 4 cases. Do not attribute hematuria to benign causes without ruling out recurrence, especially within the first 3 years post-cystectomy.

Caveats

  • Nearly 43% of hematuria cases had no identified etiology, which may reflect diagnostic limitations or under-reporting rather than truly idiopathic disease.
  • Study was published August 2026; findings are preliminary and should be validated in larger, multi-center cohorts before broad practice changes.
  • Very small sample size (n=21) means all percentages should be interpreted cautiously—confidence intervals would be wide.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the recommended workup for gross hematuria after orthotopic neobladder reconstruction?How common is urethral recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer?What are the outcomes of pouchitis after orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Sample Size
n=21
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next