ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. A blood-based test for detection of adva…

A blood-based test for detection of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer (DENEB): a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study

The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology·August 10
Gastroenterology & HepatologyPractice changingAdvanced AdenomaColorectal CancerMulticentre Diagnostic Accuracy Study (Case-Control)Blood-Based MiRNA Biomarker AssayMachine Learning Diagnostic ModelAdultOlder Adult

Summary

View source

What was studied

The DENEB study developed and validated a blood-based miRNA assay (39 cell-free and exosomal miRNAs measured by RT-qPCR, scored via XGBoost) to detect colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas in average-risk individuals aged 45+, tested in a multicentre case-control design across Spain and Japan (testing cohort n=230).

Key findings

In the testing cohort, the assay achieved an AUC of 95% (95% CI 92–98); sensitivity for colorectal cancer was 91% (95% CI 80–96) and for advanced adenomas was 81% (95% CI 69–89); specificity for advanced neoplasia was 85% (95% CI 77–90) and for negative colonoscopy was 83% (95% CI 72–91).

Study limitations

- Outcome-enriched case-control design inflates apparent performance vs. real-world screening prevalence. - Testing cohort is relatively small (n=230), limiting precision of confidence intervals. - Cohorts drawn from only two countries (Spain, Japan), limiting generalizability to other populations.

Clinical implications

This blood-based miRNA test shows high sensitivity for both colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas—the premalignant lesions most blood tests miss—but prospective large-scale trials in unselected screening populations are needed before clinical adoption.

Caveats

  • The case-control enrichment design means sensitivity and specificity estimates will likely be higher than those observed in real-world population screening—results should be interpreted cautiously until prospective screening data are available.
  • The 'impact_flag' of practice_changing is flagged tentatively; the authors themselves call for large-scale prospective validation before clinical adoption.
  • Total sample size tag reflects all cohorts combined (discovery + training + testing); the pivotal testing cohort is n=230 only.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What blood-based tests are available for colorectal cancer screening and how do they compare to FIT and colonoscopy?How well do liquid biopsy assays detect advanced adenomas compared to colorectal cancer?What is the clinical utility of miRNA biomarkers in early cancer detection?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Sample Size
n=1,613
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next