ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Outcomes of As-Needed Aflibercept Treatment After Complete Regression in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Outcomes of As-Needed Aflibercept Treatm…

Outcomes of As-Needed Aflibercept Treatment After Complete Regression in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

JAMA Ophthalmology·September 17Open Access
OphthalmologyLimited evidencePolypoidal Choroidal VasculopathyProspective Cohort StudyAnti-VEGF Intravitreal InjectionOlder AdultEyleaAflibercept

Summary

View source

What was studied

This prospective cohort study (n=81 treatment-naive eyes, 4 Thai university hospitals) evaluated outcomes of as-needed (PRN) aflibercept 2.0 mg after achieving complete polypoidal regression in PCV, following 3 or 6 monthly loading injections, with monthly follow-up in year 1 and bimonthly in year 2.

Key findings

Of 32 eyes (40%) achieving complete regression, 13/26 evaluable eyes (50%; 95% CI, 30%–70%) recurred within 2 years; fluid-free probability was 57% at week 24 and 53% at week 84. At recurrence, median BCVA loss was -3.5 letters, 21% lost ≥10 letters, and 36% developed new hemorrhage. Baseline massive subretinal hemorrhage was associated with lower recurrence risk (HR 0.18; p=0.01).

Study limitations

Small sample size (only 26 eyes reached the primary analysis), post hoc exploratory biomarker analyses are hypothesis-generating only, and the single-country Thai cohort may limit generalizability to other PCV populations.

Clinical implications

After complete polypoidal regression with aflibercept, PRN management keeps about half of eyes quiescent for up to 2 years, but the other half recur with measurable vision loss and hemorrhage risk — so close monitoring and OCT biomarker review (especially presence of leakage without subretinal hemorrhage) should guide whether to defer or continue treatment.

Caveats

  • All participants were recruited from Thailand; PCV phenotype and treatment response may differ in other ethnic and geographic populations
  • Only 26 of 81 enrolled eyes were evaluable for the primary analysis, limiting statistical power and precision of the recurrence estimates
  • The biomarker findings (e.g., leakage without subretinal hemorrhage as a recurrence predictor) are post hoc and exploratory — they should not drive practice changes without confirmatory data

Related Questions

Explore related topics

PRN versus treat-and-extend anti-VEGF after polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy regressionOCT biomarkers predicting recurrence in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathyAflibercept versus ranibizumab for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy outcomes

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
JAMA Ophthalmology
Sample Size
n=81
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next