ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Serial Ketamine Infusions for Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Serial Ketamine Infusions for Treatment-…

Serial Ketamine Infusions for Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression

JAMA Psychiatry·September 2Open Access
PsychiatryPractice changingBipolar DepressionTreatment-Resistant DepressionRandomized Controlled TrialDissociative AnestheticAdultKetamineMidazolam

Summary

View source

What was studied

This double-blind RCT (Ket-BD) evaluated adjunctive IV ketamine (0.5–0.75 mg/kg, 4 infusions over 2 weeks) vs. midazolam (active control) in 68 adult outpatients aged 21–65 with treatment-resistant bipolar I or II depression (TRBD), all on a stable mood stabilizer or antipsychotic, across 3 sites in Ontario, Canada.

Key findings

Ketamine produced a significantly greater reduction in MADRS score at day 14 vs. midazolam (between-group difference = −7.3 points; 95% CI, −12.0 to −2.5; P = .003; Cohen d = 0.7). No mania, hypomania, psychosis, or suicide attempts occurred in either group; 1 case of mixed features was seen per arm.

Study limitations

- Small sample (n=68 randomized, 63 analyzed), limiting generalizability. - Blinding was partially compromised: 47% of participants correctly guessed treatment allocation after the first infusion. - Short follow-up (14 days) leaves durability of antidepressant effect unknown.

Clinical implications

For patients with bipolar I or II depression who have failed ≥2 evidence-based pharmacotherapies, adjunctive IV ketamine (on a mood stabilizer backbone) showed a clinically meaningful antidepressant effect with no treatment-emergent mania or psychosis in this trial. Clinicians should note the small sample size and brief observation window before broad adoption.

Caveats

  • The 'practice_changing' impact flag is applied cautiously — the sample size is small (n=68) and follow-up is only 14 days; broader replication is needed before definitive practice change. The midazolam active control is a methodological strength, but partial unblinding (47% correct guesses) may have introduced expectancy bias. The study excluded participants outside the 21–65 age range, limiting applicability to older adults or younger adults below 21.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the evidence for IV ketamine in bipolar depression versus unipolar treatment-resistant depression?How does adjunctive ketamine compare to esketamine nasal spray for bipolar depression?What are the risks of treatment-emergent mania or hypomania with ketamine in bipolar disorder?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
JAMA Psychiatry
Sample Size
n=68
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next