ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Cross-Linked Chondroitin Sulfate Adhesion Barrier System in Open Rectal Resection
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Cross-Linked Chondroitin Sulfate Adhesio…

Cross-Linked Chondroitin Sulfate Adhesion Barrier System in Open Rectal Resection

JAMA Surgery·August 26Open Access
SurgeryPractice changingPostoperative AdhesionsRectal CancerRandomized Controlled TrialAnti-Adhesion BarrierAdultOlder AdultSI-449Chondroitin Sulfate Cross-Linked Powder

Summary

View source

What was studied

This multicenter RCT (53 hospitals in Japan, Sept 2020–June 2023) evaluated SI-449 — a cross-linked, powder-form chondroitin sulfate adhesion barrier (2–3 g applied to the abdominal/pelvic cavity before closure) — vs. no barrier in adults undergoing open rectal resection for clinical stage I–IV rectal cancer, with adhesion assessment at planned ileostomy closure.

Key findings

Adhesion incidence was significantly lower with SI-449 (45%, 26/58) vs. control (93%, 56/60) (P < .001); adhesion severity and extent were also significantly reduced. No safety concerns were identified.

Study limitations

Open-label design (PROBE method) limits blinding for operators; single-country (Japan) cohort may limit generalizability; relatively small modified ITT population (n=118) and short follow-up tied to ileostomy closure timeframe.

Clinical implications

In open rectal resection requiring a temporary ileostomy, applying SI-449 chondroitin sulfate powder before abdominal closure nearly halved adhesion rates compared to no barrier (45% vs. 93%). Surgeons performing planned re-entry procedures may consider this agent as a practical, powder-based anti-adhesion option.

Caveats

  • Only 29% of participants were female, which may limit generalizability across sexes for adhesion outcomes.
  • The brand name 'SI-449' is not yet widely recognized; it is an investigational product and may not be commercially available at time of reading.
  • The 'impact_flag' of practice_changing is applied cautiously — the trial is single-country and mid-sized; broader replication would strengthen the claim.
Show all 4
  • The PROBE (Prospective, Randomized, Open, Blinded-Endpoint) design means treating surgeons were not blinded, which could introduce performance bias even though endpoint assessors were blinded.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What anti-adhesion barriers are most effective in open abdominal and pelvic surgery?How do adhesion barriers compare in patients undergoing rectal resection with planned ileostomy closure?What are the clinical consequences of postoperative adhesions after colorectal surgery and how can they be prevented?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
JAMA Surgery
Sample Size
n=128
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next