ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Space radiation impairs long‐term endoth…

Space radiation impairs long‐term endothelial integrity and may promote atherosclerosis in ApoE‐deficient mice

Clinical and Translational Medicine·August 13Open Access
OncologyLimited evidenceAtherosclerosisEndothelial DysfunctionRadiation-Induced Cardiovascular InjuryAnimal Experimental StudyGamma IrradiationIonizing Radiation (Simulated Galactic Cosmic Ray)Adult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This pilot study examined the long-term effects of simulated space radiation (NASA's SimGCRSim mixed galactic cosmic ray field at 50 cGy and gamma radiation at 400 cGy) on endothelial integrity and atherosclerotic plaque development in ApoE-deficient mice sacrificed at 16 months of age — more than one year post-irradiation.

Key findings

Both radiation types significantly reduced luminal CD31+ and VE-cadherin+ endothelial coverage and eNOS expression in aortic root plaques compared with sham controls. Gamma irradiation significantly increased atherosclerotic plaque area; SimGCRSim showed a similar trend reaching only borderline significance. No significant differences were found in plaque lipid content, fibrotic area, necrotic core, or inflammatory cell infiltration (CD45+/CD68+), though a non-significant ~2-fold increase in plaque calcification was seen in the SimGCRSim group.

Study limitations

- Pilot study with small groups; SimGCRSim plaque area increase reached only borderline significance, limiting conclusions about atherosclerosis promotion. - Gamma (400 cGy) and SimGCRSim (50 cGy) doses differ substantially, making direct comparison of radiation-type effects difficult. - ApoE-null mice on normal chow are a surrogate model; mechanistic pathways were not explored.

Clinical implications

Deep-space radiation may cause lasting vascular endothelial damage and accelerate atherosclerosis well beyond one year after exposure, supporting the need for cardiovascular monitoring and countermeasure development for astronauts on long-duration missions. These findings are currently preclinical and require human validation before clinical translation.

Caveats

  • Gamma (400 cGy) and SimGCRSim (50 cGy) doses differ by 8-fold, making cross-group biological comparisons difficult to interpret; the authors acknowledge this limitation implicitly.
  • Sample size (total N) is not reported in the available text; the sample_size tag has been omitted accordingly.
  • Sex of mice is not explicitly stated in the full text; male sex is inferred from a cited companion study (Brojakowska et al. 2023) using male ApoE null mice — verify in supplementary methods.
Show all 4
  • This is a Letter to the Journal (pilot study), not a full research article; formal statistical power calculations and detailed methods are in supplementary materials not provided here.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the long-term cardiovascular risks of space radiation exposure in astronauts?How does simulated galactic cosmic ray radiation affect vascular endothelial function in animal models?What countermeasures are being studied to reduce radiation-induced atherosclerosis in deep-space missions?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Clinical and Translational Medicine
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next