ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Building families—Implementing balanced sexual and reproductive health
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Building families—Implementing balanced…

Building families—Implementing balanced sexual and reproductive health

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics·September 16Open Access
Obstetrics & GynecologyLimited evidenceContraceptionInfertilitySexual DysfunctionConsensus Statement / Position PaperFertility PreservationMale ContraceptionMedically Assisted ReproductionAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This joint scientific statement from the International Federation of Fertility Societies (IFFS) and International Society of Andrology (ISA) evaluates the three core pillars of Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH)—sexuality, infertility, and contraception—with a focus on equitable, evidence-based, couple-centered care across diverse geographies and socioeconomic contexts.

Key findings

The statement advocates for a biopsychosocial approach to SRH, calling for integrated male and female infertility evaluation, expanded male contraceptive options, medically assisted reproduction access, fertility preservation strategies, and socio-culturally sensitive contraceptive counseling to address global unmet needs.

Study limitations

As a consensus/position statement rather than an original research study, it lacks primary data, quantitative outcomes, or comparative effectiveness evidence; recommendations may not account for region-specific resource constraints in sufficient detail.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should adopt a couple-centered, multidisciplinary approach to SRH that integrates sexual function, infertility workup for both partners, and contraceptive counseling tailored to sociocultural context. Policymakers and practitioners are urged to expand access to infertility evaluation and comprehensive contraceptive services as a public health priority.

Caveats

  • Study design classification as 'Consensus Statement' is inferred from abstract language; the full text should be reviewed to confirm classification.
  • The paper addresses global SRH equity broadly; specific clinical protocols or treatment algorithms are not detailed within the abstract.
  • This is a consensus/position statement, not a clinical trial or systematic review — no primary data or effect sizes are reported. Recommendations are expert-based and advocacy-oriented.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the current evidence-based approaches to evaluating and treating male infertility in couples?How do I counsel patients on available male contraceptive options beyond condoms?What biopsychosocial factors should I assess when a couple presents with both sexual dysfunction and infertility?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next