ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Prognostic Value of MRI‐Derived Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Intermediate‐Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Definitive Radiotherapy
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Prognostic Value of MRI‐Derived Apparent…

Prognostic Value of MRI‐Derived Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Intermediate‐Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Definitive Radiotherapy

The Prostate·September 13Open Access
Urology & NephrologyLimited evidenceProstate CancerRetrospective Cohort StudyExternal Beam RadiotherapyMultiparametric MRIAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

Retrospective study of 238 intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa) patients treated with definitive radiotherapy, evaluating whether pretreatment tumor ADC (from multiparametric MRI) predicted biochemical failure (BF) and distant metastasis (DM) beyond standard favorable/unfavorable risk classification, over a median follow-up of 10.3 years.

Key findings

Low ADC (≤ 0.668 × 10⁻³ mm²/s) was independently associated with worse freedom from distant metastasis (HR 3.94, 95% CI 1.14–13.62; p = 0.03); combining ADC with clinical risk subgroup further stratified outcomes for both FFDM and FFBF (both p = 0.02), though only 22 BF events and 12 DM events occurred across 238 patients.

Study limitations

- ADC cutoff was data-derived, not pre-specified, increasing risk of overfitting. - Very few events (12 DMs, 22 BFs) limit statistical power and reliability of subgroup analyses. - The favorable intermediate-risk/low-ADC subgroup had only 7 patients, making those findings highly exploratory.

Clinical implications

Do not yet use ADC values to change treatment selection in intermediate-risk prostate cancer — the data-derived cutoff and low event count require external validation first. However, tracking pretreatment ADC on mpMRI may be worth incorporating into prospective studies as a candidate prognostic biomarker.

Caveats

  • Event counts are very low (12 distant metastases, 22 biochemical failures), so hazard ratio estimates — especially in subgroups — should be interpreted with caution.
  • No modality-specific drug/treatment brand tags applied as this study involves radiotherapy technique, not a named pharmacologic agent.
  • The ADC cutoff (≤ 0.668 × 10⁻³ mm²/s) was derived from this dataset rather than pre-specified, which raises concern for overfitting and limits generalizability until externally validated.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What imaging biomarkers on mpMRI predict outcomes in intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with radiation?How does ADC value on diffusion-weighted MRI correlate with prostate cancer aggressiveness and recurrence?Can favorable vs unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer classification be refined with MRI-based markers?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Prostate
Sample Size
n=238
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next