ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Preliminary Content Validation and Trans…

Preliminary Content Validation and Translation of the Modified Initial Measurement of Patient-Reported Pelvic Floor Complaints Tool Short Form in Kannada

International Urogynecology Journal·June 22Open Access
Obstetrics & GynecologyLimited evidencePelvic Floor DisordersInstrument Development And Content Validation StudyPatient-Reported Outcome MeasureAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This study adapted the IMPACT-SF (Initial Measurement of Patient-Reported Pelvic Floor Complaints Tool Short Form) to include toileting behaviours and Rome IV criteria, then content-validated the modified tool using 11 experts over three rounds and translated it into Kannada with cognitive debriefing in 30 female participants.

Key findings

The modified IMPACT-SF achieved excellent content validity with a scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) of 0.92–0.97; minor wording amendments were made to the Kannada version after cognitive debriefing.

Study limitations

- Full psychometric validation (reliability, construct validity, responsiveness) has not yet been completed. - Study participants were exclusively female, limiting applicability to male patients with pelvic floor disorders. - Sample sizes for critical review (n=5) and cognitive debriefing (n=30) are small.

Clinical implications

The Kannada-language modified IMPACT-SF shows strong content validity as a preliminary pelvic floor screening tool for Kannada-speaking populations, but clinicians should await full psychometric validation before using it as a primary outcome measure.

Caveats

  • Study design classification is approximate; this is a mixed-methods instrument adaptation study, not a standard clinical trial design.
  • The PDF full text extracted by the system appears to belong to a different document (Eurostat guidelines for health survey instruments, 2005) and does not match the abstract content of the published paper. Summary and tags are derived solely from the abstract and results/conclusions sections provided, not the full text.
  • The sample size tag reflects the cognitive debriefing cohort (n=30); the expert panel comprised 11 individuals and the critical review involved 5 participants — these are separate subgroups, not additive.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the full psychometric validation process for patient-reported outcome measures in pelvic floor disorders?How do Rome IV criteria apply to pelvic floor disorder assessment tools?What validated Kannada-language PROMs exist for urogynecological conditions?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
International Urogynecology Journal
Sample Size
n=30
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next