ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives o…

Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives on the Direct Referral Pathway for Syphilis Management in Western Sydney

Archives of Sexual Behavior·August 13Open Access
Psychology, ClinicalPractice changingCongenital SyphilisSyphilisEvidence Brief (Systematic Literature Review + Survey)Care CoordinationPublic Health Case ManagementAdultPenicillin G Benzathine

Summary

View source

What was studied

This evidence brief (Public Health Ontario, 2025) reviewed peer-reviewed and grey literature, and surveyed 31 of 34 Ontario public health units (PHUs), to identify effective public health case and contact management approaches for syphilis in women of childbearing age and pregnant people, with a focus on preventing congenital syphilis.

Key findings

Only 2 relevant peer-reviewed studies were found. One (Munro et al., 2017; n=131 pre + 24 intervention) showed an electronic referral pathway with a designated coordinator improved initial contact from 64% to 96% (p<0.001). A Florida electronic notification system (Matthias et al., 2019) resolved missing pregnancy status in 63/76 (82.9%) women over 9 months. Ontario PHU survey: 93.5% had pregnancy-specific syphilis policies; 44% of maternal cases linked to congenital syphilis (2020–2022) were lost to public health follow-up. Between 2014 and 2023, congenital syphilis cases rose from ~1.5/year to 23 cases in 2022.

Study limitations

- Peer-reviewed evidence base is extremely thin (only 2 relevant studies identified from 397 screened); no formal quality appraisal of included studies was performed. - Survey results are descriptive only; proportional uptake of specific strategies by PHU could not be reported. - Approaches from other jurisdictions may not transfer directly to Ontario given differences in health system structure and funding.

Clinical implications

Prioritize documenting pregnancy status for all women of childbearing age with syphilis, and flag pregnant cases for same-day, high-priority follow-up — this single step underpins every downstream intervention to prevent congenital syphilis. Designating a single staff member for pregnant syphilis cases and building formal referral pathways to sexual health and prenatal care appear to improve treatment uptake and reduce loss to follow-up, even without robust RCT evidence.

Caveats

  • Level of evidence assigned as 5 (expert report/narrative review with survey) due to the evidence brief format and very limited peer-reviewed literature base.
  • Sample size of n=31 refers to PHU survey respondents, not a clinical trial cohort; the two peer-reviewed studies cited had much smaller samples (n=76 and n=131/24).
  • The 'impact_flag' of practice_changing is applied cautiously — the recommendations are consensus/expert-level given the thin RCT evidence base.
Show all 4
  • The paper listed in the DOI/title metadata is a qualitative study on a Western Sydney referral pathway, but the full text provided is actually a Public Health Ontario evidence brief on syphilis management in women and pregnant people — these are two different documents. Summaries and tags reflect the actual full text (the Ontario evidence brief), not the abstract.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What public health interventions most effectively prevent congenital syphilis in pregnant women?How should public health units prioritize and follow up syphilis cases in pregnant patients?What are evidence-based strategies to reduce loss to follow-up in pregnant people with syphilis?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Sample Size
n=31
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next