ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Narratives on Sexuality in Vulvodynia an…

Narratives on Sexuality in Vulvodynia and Endometriosis: A Qualitative Study on Italian Couples

Archives of Sexual Behavior·August 15Open Access
Psychology, ClinicalLimited evidenceDyspareuniaEndometriosisVulvodyniaQualitative StudyAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This qualitative study explored how 9 Italian heterosexual couples (mean age 34 years, n=18 participants) living with dyspareunia from vulvodynia and/or endometriosis jointly construct meanings of sexuality and navigate intimacy in the presence of pain, using episodic interviews and reflexive thematic analysis.

Key findings

Four relational patterns emerged: (1) pain reshaping sexuality from a shared bodily-emotional experience into loss or renegotiation; (2) mirrored silent restraint where men held back desire and women consented or hid pain; (3) unilateral coping where one partner tried to 'solve' sexual difficulties alone, increasing distance; and (4) mutual renegotiation—present in fewer couples—where open dialogue enabled co-constructed intimacy beyond penetration.

Study limitations

- Very small, self-selected sample (9 couples) of heterosexual Italian couples who stayed together, likely skewing narratives toward resilience. - Partners interviewed separately (no real-time dyadic observation), limiting capture of live interactional dynamics. - All interviewers were women, which may have shaped how participants narrated sexual experiences.

Clinical implications

Couple-centered therapy should target unspoken asymmetries—who holds desire back, who hides pain—and help partners shift from individual problem-solving to shared meaning-making about intimacy. Supporting open dialogue about pain, desire, and boundaries (not just symptom management) may itself be a therapeutic act, as several participants found the research interview transformative.

Caveats

  • No formal ethics board approval was obtained (authors cite Italian regulations exempting non-interventional qualitative studies with healthy adults); this may be a consideration for some readers.
  • Reflexive thematic analysis is inherently interpretive; themes are co-constructions of the research team, not objective categories — the social constructionist lens shaped both data collection and analysis.
  • Sample comprises only 9 heterosexual Italian couples who remained together through their difficulties — findings may not generalize to couples who separated, same-sex couples, or non-Italian populations.
Show all 4
  • The study was conducted via online video interviews during COVID-19 restrictions (early 2022), which may have affected interview dynamics compared to in-person settings.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does couple-based therapy improve sexual outcomes in women with vulvodynia or endometriosis?What communication strategies help couples maintain intimacy when one partner has chronic pelvic pain?How do male partners of women with dyspareunia experience and cope with sexual difficulties?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Sample Size
n=18
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next