ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
The outcomes of surrogate pregnancy using donor egg compared to surrogate’s egg: a systematic review
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. The outcomes of surrogate pregnancy usin…

The outcomes of surrogate pregnancy using donor egg compared to surrogate’s egg: a systematic review

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics·August 28Open Access
Obstetrics & GynecologySafety signalGestational DiabetesGestational HypertensionGestational SurrogacyPre-EclampsiaPreterm BirthSystematic Review And Meta-AnalysisDonor Egg Assisted ReproductionAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This systematic review compared obstetric outcomes in gestational surrogacy (GS, using donor egg) vs. traditional surrogacy (TS, using the surrogate's own egg) and vs. the surrogate's own spontaneous conceptions (SC) in singleton pregnancies, searching four databases through October 2024.

Key findings

Eight studies were included (four GS vs. TS; four TS vs. SC). GS vs. SC showed significantly higher rates of pre-eclampsia/gestational hypertension (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.15–4.49), gestational diabetes (RR 4.68, 95% CI 1.53–14.25), and preterm birth (RR 3.18, 95% CI 1.64–6.14); GS vs. TS results were imprecise due to small study sizes.

Study limitations

- Only eight small studies qualified, making GS vs. TS comparisons underpowered and imprecise. - Full text extraction failed (PDF pages were blank); conclusions rely entirely on the abstract and results sections. - Twin pregnancies were not analyzed separately, limiting generalizability.

Clinical implications

Clinicians counseling surrogates and intended parents should discuss that gestational surrogacy (donor egg) carries roughly 2–5× higher risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, and preterm birth compared to the surrogate's own conceptions. Until more direct GS vs. TS data exist, informed consent should explicitly address these elevated maternal and neonatal risks.

Caveats

  • Study design tagged as 'Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis' based on abstract description; the meta-analysis component applies only to the TS vs. SC comparison (four studies).
  • The full text PDF pages were entirely blank; all extracted data come solely from the abstract and results sections, so nuanced methodological details (e.g., individual study characteristics, quality scores, heterogeneity statistics) could not be verified.
  • The sample size tag reflects the number of included studies (n=8), not individual participants, as participant-level totals were not reported in the available text.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the obstetric risks of gestational surrogacy compared to traditional surrogacy?How does donor egg pregnancy affect risk of pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes?What should surrogates and intended parents be told about complications in IVF surrogacy pregnancies?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Sample Size
n=8
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next