ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Histories of Victimization: Experiences…

Histories of Victimization: Experiences from Victim-Survivors of Intimate Partner Firearm Violence who Petition for Domestic Violence Restraining Orders

Journal of Family Violence·August 18Open Access
Psychology, ClinicalSafety signalCoercive ControlIntimate Partner Firearm ViolenceIntimate Partner ViolenceCross-Sectional SurveyAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

Guided survey interviews with 83 DVRO petitioners who experienced intimate partner firearm violence (IPFV) across three Midwestern states (Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin), examining their abuse histories and the events that led them to petition, recruited December 2023–March 2025.

Key findings

All 83 petitioners reported physical violence, psychological/emotional abuse, and stalking; 80% reported sexual violence. In the 6 months before filing, 65% reported a near-lethal incident, 66% were threatened with death, 47% were intimidated by firearm handling, and 27% had a firearm aimed at them. The mean relationship-to-petition duration was 8 years, and abuse escalated in coercive control, technology-facilitated abuse, and physical violence for most petitioners in the 6 months before filing.

Study limitations

- Small, non-representative sample (n=83) from three Midwestern states limits generalizability. - Latine/Spanish-speaking survivors were underrepresented (8.4%), missing a high-barrier population. - Recruitment through domestic violence service organizations may skew toward those with more severe or help-seeking presentations.

Clinical implications

Clinicians and court actors who encounter DVRO petitioners should recognize that IPFV rarely involves isolated incidents — it typically reflects years of coercive, multi-tactic abuse in which firearms amplify fear and control well before any shot is fired. Dismissing petitioners as exaggerating or misusing the system is inconsistent with the evidence.

Caveats

  • Study design is descriptive/cross-sectional with no comparison group; causal inferences cannot be drawn.
  • The 'guided survey interview' format combines quantitative and qualitative elements; the study_design label 'Cross-Sectional Survey' is an approximation — the content analysis component has qualitative characteristics.
  • The sample is predominantly female (94%) and drawn from domestic violence service organizations in three Midwestern U.S. states — findings may not generalize to all DVRO petitioners or other geographic/demographic contexts.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the evidence that domestic violence restraining orders reduce intimate partner homicide risk?How does non-fatal firearm use by abusive partners affect victim mental health and PTSD?What are the barriers for Latine and immigrant survivors in accessing domestic violence protective orders?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Family Violence
Sample Size
n=83
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next