ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Beyond Crisis Intervention: A Systematic…

Beyond Crisis Intervention: A Systematic Review of Multi-component Interventions That Facilitate Recovery and Healing From Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence

Journal of Family Violence·August 21Open Access
Psychology, ClinicalLimited evidenceDomestic ViolencePost-Traumatic Stress DisorderSexual ViolenceSystematic ReviewCreative Arts TherapyPeer SupportPsychotherapySomatic TherapyAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This systematic review examined multi-component interventions (combining counselling/psychotherapy with somatic practices, creative arts, nature-based activities, peer connection, and practical supports) designed to support recovery and healing—beyond symptom reduction—in adult women with histories of domestic, family, and sexual violence (DFSV), drawing on studies published 2000–2024 across seven databases.

Key findings

Of 12,519 records screened, 15 studies (total n=861 victim-survivors) met inclusion criteria. Integrative therapies combining counselling with body-oriented practices showed favorable outcomes, including reduced mental health symptoms, enhanced social connection, empowerment, improved self-concept, and strengthened parenting capacities. Group-based formats and peer connection were key components, though effectiveness varied by individual recovery stage and context.

Study limitations

- Only 15 studies met inclusion criteria from 12,519 screened records, indicating a thin evidence base. - All eligible studies focused exclusively on adult women, limiting generalizability to men, children, and gender-diverse survivors. - The review calls for more rigorous trials across diverse cultural and geographic contexts, suggesting most included studies lack methodological rigor or contextual diversity.

Clinical implications

Clinicians working with DFSV survivors should consider integrative, multi-component approaches that pair trauma-focused therapy with body-oriented practices (e.g., somatic work, yoga) and peer or group formats, rather than relying solely on symptom-reduction models. Practical supports—housing, legal, and financial—should be embedded in recovery planning, as safety and stability are prerequisites for healing.

Caveats

  • Level of evidence assigned as '2' for systematic review; however, the review notes that included primary studies likely vary in methodological quality, and the overall evidence base is described as thin and fragmented.
  • The full-text roundtable report does not contain the 15-study systematic review data; quantitative findings (n=861, 15 studies) are drawn solely from the abstract.
  • The paper submitted for extraction is primarily a roundtable report (qualitative policy document), but the DOI and abstract describe a separate systematic review published in the Journal of Family Violence. The full text extracted belongs to the roundtable report, while the abstract belongs to the systematic review. Summary and tags are based on the abstract of the systematic review, as the full-text of that article was not provided.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What multi-component trauma therapies show the best outcomes for domestic violence survivors?How effective is somatic or body-based therapy combined with counselling for PTSD in abuse survivors?What role does peer support play in long-term recovery from intimate partner violence?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Family Violence
Sample Size
n=861
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next