ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Brain Injury and Family Violence: Establishing a Tool to Support Clinical Practice
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Brain Injury and Family Violence: Establ…

Brain Injury and Family Violence: Establishing a Tool to Support Clinical Practice

Journal of Family Violence·September 1Open Access
Psychology, ClinicalLimited evidenceAcquired Brain InjuryCognitive DysfunctionFamily ViolencePsychological TraumaDelphi StudyMixed

Summary

View source

What was studied

A modified Delphi study aimed to develop content for a brain injury and cognitive dysfunction screening tool (BIC-FV) tailored to victim-survivors of family violence, using an expert panel of 22 participants (neuropsychologists, social workers, medical professionals, family violence clinicians, Aboriginal peoples, and people with lived experience) across three iterative survey rounds.

Key findings

The expert panel reached consensus on 32 items for a full-form screening tool covering acquired brain injury, cognitive dysfunction, and psychological trauma; 16 of those 32 items were endorsed for a short form; and 6 optional demographic items were approved for both versions.

Study limitations

- Small expert panel (n=22 declining to n=17 by round 3), limiting breadth of consensus. - The BIC-FV tool has not yet been validated; psychometric properties (reliability, sensitivity, specificity) remain untested. - No victim-survivors were directly involved in completing the Delphi surveys; lived experience was represented through clinician proxies or panel members, not direct participant testing.

Clinical implications

Existing brain injury screening tools were not designed for family violence settings and may miss cognitive and trauma-related sequelae in victim-survivors — the BIC-FV offers a purpose-built alternative once validated. Clinicians in family violence services should anticipate a short-form screening option (16 items) designed for frontline use, pending pilot validation studies.

Caveats

  • Sample size of n=22 refers to the expert panel, not a clinical patient population — comparisons to clinical study samples should be made cautiously.
  • The BIC-FV tool items themselves are not listed in the available text; the 32-item and 16-item structures are referenced but not detailed.
  • The full text provided is primarily from a 2018 Brain Injury Australia prevalence report (a different document), not the 2026 Delphi study described in the abstract. Summary and tags are based on the abstract alone, as the full Delphi study content was not available in the provided text.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What screening tools exist for traumatic brain injury in domestic violence survivors?How does cognitive dysfunction from psychological trauma differ from acquired brain injury in family violence victims?What are best practices for adapting brain injury services to meet the needs of intimate partner violence survivors?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Family Violence
Sample Size
n=22
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next