ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
The Relationship Between Social Cognition and Social Behavior in Patients with a Neurodegenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. The Relationship Between Social Cognitio…

The Relationship Between Social Cognition and Social Behavior in Patients with a Neurodegenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neuropsychology Review·September 1Open Access
Psychology, ClinicalLimited evidenceAlzheimer'S DiseaseFrontotemporal DementiaHuntington'S DiseaseNeurodegenerative DiseaseParkinson'S DiseaseSystematic Review And Meta-AnalysisAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the relationship between social cognition (SC) — measured with performance-based tests of emotion recognition and theory of mind (ToM) — and social behavior (disinhibition, apathy, irritability, agitation) rated by proxies, across adult patients with neurodegenerative diseases (AD, FTD, PD, HD, and others). Twenty-one cross-sectional studies published up to September 2023 were included.

Key findings

Evidence for a consistent SC–social behavior link was weak. Meta-analyses found only small pooled effects: better emotion recognition correlated with fewer total behavioral symptoms (r = −.23, 95% CI [−0.42, −0.02]) and less apathy (r = −.24, 95% CI [−0.46, 0.01]), the latter non-significant. Disinhibition was most often associated with SC deficits (~50% of studies for total emotion recognition score); affective ToM was more consistently linked to behavioral symptoms than cognitive ToM. No associations were found between SC and irritability or agitation.

Study limitations

- Only 21 cross-sectional studies with small samples (median n = 26) were available, limiting meta-analytic power and causal inference. - High heterogeneity across studies in SC and social behavior instruments (I² = 69–75%) prevented broader meta-analyses. - Proxy ratings of behavior are subjective and may be influenced by caregiver burden; no correction for multiple comparisons was applied in the qualitative synthesis.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should not rely on SC test scores alone to predict or explain social behavioral changes in neurodegenerative disease — the link is weak and inconsistent. Standardized, ecologically valid SC and behavioral measures are needed before SC testing can serve as a reliable early indicator of behavioral deterioration.

Caveats

  • No pharmacological or therapeutic interventions were assessed; no modality, brand, or generic drug tags are applicable.
  • Sample size tag reflects the number of included studies (n=21), not individual patients; individual study sample sizes ranged from 12 to 187 with a median of 26. The meta-analyses themselves included 299–382 patients across 8 studies each.
  • The level of evidence (2) reflects the systematic review design; the underlying studies are all cross-sectional observational, limiting causal conclusions.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does emotion recognition impairment relate to apathy in frontotemporal dementia?Are there validated tools to measure social behavior changes in Alzheimer's disease using proxy ratings?Does affective theory of mind predict behavioral symptoms better than cognitive theory of mind in neurodegenerative diseases?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Neuropsychology Review
Sample Size
n=21
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next