ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
From Stability to Flexibility: Neural Network Dynamics Associated with Trait Mindfulness
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. From Stability to Flexibility: Neural Ne…

From Stability to Flexibility: Neural Network Dynamics Associated with Trait Mindfulness

Mindfulness·August 10
Psychology, ClinicalLimited evidenceTrait MindfulnessCross-Sectional Observational StudyMindfulness MeditationResting-State FMRIAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This resting-state fMRI study compared static (sFNC) and dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) between 20 experienced meditators and 20 novice adults under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, using ICA, partial correlations with FFMQ subscales, and Bayesian logistic regression with cross-validation to identify neural markers of trait mindfulness.

Key findings

Experienced meditators showed stronger sFNC between the left frontoparietal network (LFPN) and anterior default mode network (aDMN), positively correlated with the FFMQ Acting with Awareness subscale. At the dynamic level, they spent more time in a highly integrated network state and less time in a partially segregated state. sFNC-based classification achieved accuracy = 0.73 and AUC = 0.81; adding dFNC features or FFMQ scores did not meaningfully improve performance.

Study limitations

- Very small sample (n=40 total; 20 per group), limiting statistical power and generalizability. - Cross-sectional design prevents causal inference about whether meditation drives connectivity differences. - Data are not publicly available, limiting reproducibility.

Clinical implications

Static LFPN–aDMN connectivity may serve as a candidate neural marker for trait mindfulness, but the small sample and cross-sectional design mean these findings are preliminary — not yet ready to guide clinical selection or monitoring of meditators.

Caveats

  • Only a subset of the preregistered outcomes are reported here; other preregistered measures were outside the scope of this manuscript, which may introduce selective reporting concerns.
  • Sample size is very small (n=20 per group), which limits confidence in classification accuracy and correlation findings. Results should be interpreted as preliminary.
  • Study design was labeled as observational/cross-sectional; it is not a randomized controlled trial despite being preregistered on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Show all 4
  • The study is cross-sectional with pre-existing meditators vs. novices — self-selection bias cannot be excluded, and causal direction cannot be established.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What brain network changes are associated with long-term meditation practice on fMRI?How does dynamic functional connectivity differ between meditators and non-meditators?Can resting-state fMRI connectivity predict mindfulness trait levels using machine learning?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Mindfulness
Sample Size
n=40
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next