ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Bringing cognitive behavioral therapy fo…

Bringing cognitive behavioral therapy for nightmares to patients with trauma: increasing access and feasibility via primary and acute care

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine·July 7Open Access
Clinical NeurologyLimited evidenceAcute TraumaNightmare DisorderPosttraumatic Stress DisorderCommentary With Embedded Pilot Randomized Controlled TrialCognitive Behavioral TherapyAdultCBT For InsomniaCBT For Nightmares

Summary

View source

What was studied

This commentary evaluates the feasibility of delivering Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Nightmares (CBT-N) in non-traditional settings — specifically the VA Primary Care Mental Health Integration (PCMHI) clinic and, separately, via telehealth to acute trauma patients discharged from emergency departments within 72 hours of trauma.

Key findings

PCMHI clinicians perceived greater veteran benefit from CBT-N vs. other VA mental health settings, but 57% cited time constraints as a barrier to feasibility. In a pilot RCT (n=34 randomized), 85.1% of acute trauma ED patients expressed interest in nightmare therapy, 76.5% initiated telehealth treatment, and 100% rated video sessions as 'very easy' to attend; 71.4% said in-person attendance would have been difficult.

Study limitations

- The PCMHI findings (Bolstad et al.) rely on clinician-perceived outcomes, not objective or patient-reported measures. - The authors' own pilot RCT has a very small sample (n=34) and is ongoing, so preventive effects on PTSD are not yet established. - The commentary cannot determine whether better PCMHI outcomes reflect early intervention or lower baseline severity.

Clinical implications

Clinicians in primary care and emergency settings should proactively screen for nightmares using the 'DARC' criteria (Dreams causing Awakenings, partially Remembered, causing Clinically significant impairment) and consider offering CBT-N or referring patients — especially in the acute post-trauma period when interest and telehealth engagement are high.

Caveats

  • Sample size tag reflects only the authors' own pilot RCT, not the Bolstad et al. study discussed in the commentary, whose sample size is not reported here.
  • Study design is a hybrid: expert commentary plus embedded pilot RCT data — clinicians should interpret pilot results with caution pending full trial completion.
  • The primary level-of-evidence tag reflects the commentary format; the embedded pilot RCT (n=34, NCT07121270) is ongoing and findings reported are preliminary only.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How effective is CBT for nightmares in veterans with PTSD?What are the best ways to screen and treat nightmares in primary care settings?Can telehealth delivery of behavioral sleep interventions prevent PTSD after acute trauma?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
Sample Size
n=34
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next