ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
LYNX-1: A Phase 3 Study of 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects with Dim Light Vision Disturbances
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. LYNX-1: A Phase 3 Study of 0.75% Phentol…

LYNX-1: A Phase 3 Study of 0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects with Dim Light Vision Disturbances

American Journal of Ophthalmology·September 2
OphthalmologyConfirms priorDim Light Vision DisturbancesPost-Keratorefractive Surgery ComplicationsReduced Mesopic Low-Contrast Visual AcuityRandomized Controlled TrialAlpha-Adrenergic Antagonist Ophthalmic SolutionAdultPhentolamine

Summary

View source

What was studied

Phase 3 RCT evaluating 0.75% phentolamine ophthalmic solution (POS) vs. placebo, administered once nightly for 14 days, in 145 subjects with dim light vision disturbances (DLD), mesopic pupil ≥5 mm, and reduced mesopic low-contrast visual acuity (mLCVA ≤30 ETDRS letters); included a post-hoc subgroup of post-keratorefractive surgery patients (n=25).

Key findings

POS significantly improved mLCVA at Day 8 (13% vs. 3% placebo, p<0.05) and Day 15 (21% vs. 3% placebo, p<0.01), with significant reductions in self-reported glare, halos, and starburst severity at both time points (p<0.01); no significant difference in conjunctival hyperemia or vital signs between arms.

Study limitations

Short treatment duration (14 days) limits conclusions about long-term efficacy and safety; post-keratorefractive subgroup analysis was post-hoc and underpowered (n=25); the study does not report whether mLCVA improvements translated to functional real-world driving or nighttime performance outcomes.

Clinical implications

For patients with symptomatic dim light disturbances and reduced mesopic contrast vision — including those post-LASIK or other keratorefractive surgery — nightly 0.75% phentolamine eye drops may offer meaningful short-term improvement in both visual acuity and photic symptoms. Adverse events were mild and transient, suggesting a favorable near-term tolerability profile, though longer-term data are still needed.

Caveats

  • Age distribution and sex breakdown of the study population are not reported in the available abstract, so age_group and sex tags are inferred from general trial convention.
  • The abstract does not report absolute letter-score changes in mLCVA — only the percentage of subjects who improved — which limits direct clinical interpretation of the magnitude of benefit.
  • The paper's publication date (September 2026) is recent; this is a newly published Phase 3 trial and independent replication is not yet available.
Show all 4
  • The post-keratorefractive subgroup (n=25) was analyzed post-hoc and is likely underpowered; findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating only.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the long-term safety and efficacy data for phentolamine ophthalmic solution in night vision disturbances?How does phentolamine eye drops compare to other treatments for halos and glare after LASIK surgery?Which pharmacologic options reduce mesopic pupil size and improve low-contrast vision in adults?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Sample Size
n=145
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next