ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Molecular and immune profiling of HER2-low, HER2 ultra-low, and HER2-null male breast cancer
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Molecular and immune profiling of HER2-l…

Molecular and immune profiling of HER2-low, HER2 ultra-low, and HER2-null male breast cancer

The Breast·August 12Open Access
Obstetrics & GynecologyLimited evidenceHER2-Low Breast CancerMale Breast CancerMolecular Profiling Study (Retrospective Cohort)Antibody-Drug ConjugateAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

Molecular, transcriptomic, and immune profiles of 214 male breast tumors stratified by HER2 expression (null, ultra-low, low, and positive) using next-generation sequencing and whole-transcriptome sequencing.

Key findings

HER2-null tumors (30.8%) were the most biologically distinct: enriched in neutrophils and upregulated stemness genes (NANOG, KLF4, POU5F1) and CEACAM1. HER2 ultra-low tumors had higher PIK3CA mutation rates vs. HER2-null (39.2% vs. 22.6%, p ≤ 0.05) and greater B-cell infiltration. HER2-low and ultra-low subgroups were largely similar across most molecular and immune readouts. No significant differences in TMB-high frequency or PD-L1 expression were seen across subgroups.

Study limitations

- Small cohort (n=214) of a rare cancer limits statistical power, especially for the HER2-positive subgroup (n=15). - Immune cell fractions were computationally inferred (Quantiseq deconvolution), not directly measured. - Hypothesis-generating only; no clinical outcomes or treatment response data reported.

Clinical implications

HER2-null male breast cancer shows distinct biology from HER2-low/ultra-low disease, suggesting it may warrant separate biomarker strategies. HER2-low and ultra-low male tumors are molecularly similar, which may support parallel ADC eligibility considerations as in female breast cancer — but prospective validation is needed.

Caveats

  • Immune cell fractions are computationally inferred via Quantiseq deconvolution, not validated by direct immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry.
  • Study design is retrospective and hypothesis-generating; no clinical outcomes or treatment response data are included. Findings should not yet guide clinical decision-making.
  • The HER2-positive subgroup is very small (n=15), limiting any comparisons involving that group.
Show all 4
  • This study focuses exclusively on male breast cancer, so findings may not generalize to the far more prevalent female breast cancer population.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the treatment options for HER2-low male breast cancer with antibody-drug conjugates?How does PIK3CA mutation frequency differ across HER2 expression subgroups in breast cancer?What is the clinical significance of HER2 ultra-low classification in breast cancer management?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Breast
Sample Size
n=214
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next