ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. BMI trajectories and their relation to m…

BMI trajectories and their relation to medication, comorbidities, and healthcare service use among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice·August 22Open Access
Endocrinology & MetabolismConfirms priorCardiovascular DiseaseChronic Kidney DiseaseDementiaObesityType 2 Diabetes MellitusLongitudinal Cohort StudyGLP-1 Receptor AgonistAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

BMI trajectories were identified in 3,539 adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosed in North Karelia (2011–2014) and followed through 2024, examining associations with lab monitoring, medication use, comorbidities, and healthcare utilization across trajectory groups.

Key findings

Three BMI trajectories emerged: stable (77.7%), increasing (14.6%), and decreasing (7.7%). The decreasing group had the lowest HbA1c and LDL monitoring rates and the highest healthcare utilization, and was marked by higher rates of dementia and cardiovascular/pulmonary disease; the increasing group accumulated more chronic kidney disease, obesity-related diagnoses, sleep disorders, and chronic lower respiratory disease. GLP-1 agonist use peaked in the decreasing class in 2015 and in the increasing class in 2024.

Study limitations

Single Finnish region (North Karelia) limits generalizability. Observational design prevents causal inference. No data on intentional vs. unintentional weight loss in the decreasing class, which is clinically important.

Clinical implications

Patients with T2D who are losing weight warrant closer metabolic monitoring and comorbidity screening—not less—as this group showed the lowest lab measurement activity despite the highest healthcare use. Clinicians should tailor comorbidity surveillance by BMI trajectory, watching for kidney disease and sleep disorders in those gaining weight.

Caveats

  • Growth mixture modeling assigns patients to trajectory classes probabilistically; class membership uncertainty is not discussed in the abstract.
  • The study does not distinguish between intentional and unintentional weight loss in the decreasing BMI class, which is a clinically critical distinction for interpreting outcomes in that group.
  • The study is from a single Finnish region (North Karelia), which may limit applicability to more diverse or non-European populations.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How should clinicians monitor patients with type 2 diabetes who are losing weight unintentionally?What comorbidities are most common in type 2 diabetes patients with increasing BMI over time?How does GLP-1 receptor agonist use affect long-term BMI trajectories in type 2 diabetes?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Sample Size
n=3,539
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next