ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Influence of donor-transmitted coronary artery disease on the progression of coronary vasculopathy after heart transplantation
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Influence of donor-transmitted coronary…

Influence of donor-transmitted coronary artery disease on the progression of coronary vasculopathy after heart transplantation

The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation·September 21
Respiratory SystemSurgeryPractice changingCardiac Allograft VasculopathyCoronary Artery DiseaseHeart TransplantationRetrospective Cohort StudyCoronary AngiographyAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This retrospective multicenter study (Spain, 2008–2018) evaluated whether angiographically detected donor-transmitted coronary artery disease (dtCAD) — significant (≥50% stenosis) or non-significant (<50%) — independently predicts CAD progression in adult heart transplant (HT) recipients over up to 5 years post-transplant.

Key findings

Both significant dtCAD (adjusted SHR 2.38; 95% CI 1.26–4.52) and non-significant dtCAD (adjusted SHR 2.92; 95% CI 1.67–5.08) were independent predictors of CAD progression; overall 5-year cumulative CAD progression incidence was 16.09%, versus progression rates of ~9.65 and 9.24 per 100 person-years for s-dtCAD and ns-dtCAD compared with 2.72 per 100 person-years in those with no dtCAD.

Study limitations

Retrospective design limits causal inference; only 937 of 1,918 recipients had a baseline angiogram (selection bias risk); 5-year follow-up angiograms were available in only 246 patients, reducing long-term statistical power.

Clinical implications

Even non-significant (<50% stenosis) donor coronary disease at baseline angiogram nearly triples the risk of CAD progression after heart transplant — clinicians should flag any degree of dtCAD detected on early post-transplant angiography and consider more vigilant surveillance protocols for these recipients.

Caveats

  • CAD progression was defined angiographically (≥50% new stenosis); subclinical disease detectable only by intravascular imaging (e.g., IVUS) was not captured, potentially underreporting early vasculopathy
  • Long-term 5-year angiographic follow-up was available in only 246 patients (~26% of those with a 1-year angiogram), which may underestimate true long-term progression rates
  • Only 937 of 1,918 eligible recipients had a baseline angiogram, raising the possibility of selection bias that could affect generalizability

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How should heart transplant recipients with donor-transmitted coronary artery disease be monitored for vasculopathy progression?Does intravascular ultrasound better detect donor-transmitted CAD compared to conventional angiography after heart transplant?What are the long-term survival outcomes in heart transplant recipients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Sample Size
n=937
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next