Using a hypothetical case study, this paper examines how advance healthcare directives (AHDs) that refuse basic care, pain relief, and palliative symptom management should be handled under Ireland's Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 (ADMCA).
The authors identify significant ambiguities within the ADMCA regarding refusal of palliative care and pain relief, and argue that even when a healthcare professional deems an AHD valid and applicable, cases involving refusal of palliative care warrant referral to court.
Analysis is based on a hypothetical case study rather than real patient cases, limiting direct clinical applicability. The paper is jurisdiction-specific (Ireland) and may not generalize to other legal frameworks.
When an Irish patient's AHD refuses palliative care or pain relief, clinicians should consult the patient's decision-making representative or family and consider court referral even if the directive appears valid and applicable. Do not rely solely on definitional interpretations of 'basic care' — the full legislative framework must be assessed.
Explore related topics
