ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. ABACHAI - Safety and efficacy of abatace…

ABACHAI - Safety and efficacy of abatacept (s.c.) in patients with CTLA4 insufficiency or LRBA deficiency, a phase II clinical trial

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology·September 19Open Access
AllergyLimited evidenceCTLA-4 InsufficiencyLRBA DeficiencyPhase II Clinical TrialCTLA-4 Fusion ProteinAdultOrenciaAbatacept

Summary

View source

What was studied

Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous abatacept (125 mg once weekly for 12 months) in adults with genetically confirmed CTLA-4 insufficiency or LRBA deficiency with at least one clinically significant organ manifestation, in a prospective open-label single-arm phase IIa trial.

Key findings

Among 20 enrolled patients, the severe infection incidence rate was 0.27 per patient-year (5 episodes in 3 patients) — comparable to the pre-enrolment year — with no EBV or CMV reactivations. Abatacept reduced lymphoproliferation and immune activation and improved quality of life and GI symptom scores, but cytopenias and renal involvement were not sufficiently controlled; 4 patients (20%) discontinued.

Study limitations

Very small sample (n=20) with only 2 LRBA deficiency patients, limiting conclusions for that subgroup. Single-arm design with no control group makes it impossible to separate treatment effects from natural disease course. Study was limited to adults, so findings may not apply to children.

Clinical implications

Subcutaneous abatacept appears safe and effective for lymphoproliferation and immune activation in CTLA-4 insufficiency, and can be considered as a structured therapy in these patients. Those with refractory cytopenias or progressive renal involvement likely need additional or alternative treatments beyond abatacept alone.

Caveats

  • 20% discontinuation rate may introduce attrition bias in the efficacy assessments
  • All enrolled patients were adults; generalisability to the paediatric population — where these conditions are commonly diagnosed — is uncertain
  • Single-arm open-label design means efficacy comparisons are observational; placebo or active comparator data are absent
Show all 4
  • The cohort includes only 2 LRBA deficiency patients; conclusions about this subgroup should be treated with caution

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the current treatment options for CTLA-4 insufficiency beyond abatacept?How does abatacept compare to sirolimus for LRBA deficiency management?What are the outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in CTLA-4 insufficiency with refractory cytopenias?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Sample Size
n=20
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next