ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Ciprofloxacin metabolites drive resistance development and biofilm changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Ciprofloxacin metabolites drive resistan…

Ciprofloxacin metabolites drive resistance development and biofilm changes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus

Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance·July 29Open Access
Infectious DiseasesLimited evidenceSafety signalAntimicrobial ResistanceBiofilm-Associated InfectionPseudomonas Aeruginosa InfectionStaphylococcus Aureus InfectionIn Vitro Experimental StudyFluoroquinoloneCiprofloxacin

Summary

View source

What was studied

This study investigated how two major ciprofloxacin metabolites — 2-oxo ciprofloxacin (M3) and N-formyl ciprofloxacin (M4) — affect resistance development and biofilm characteristics in *P. aeruginosa* (PAO1) and *S. aureus* (ATCC 25923) after 30 days of subinhibitory co-culture exposure.

Key findings

In *S. aureus*, M3 and M4 caused 8-fold and 4-fold increases in ciprofloxacin MIC, respectively. In *P. aeruginosa*, MICs were unchanged but both metabolites significantly enhanced biofilm formation (M4: P<0.0001; M3: P=0.0089); M3 exposure also selected a missense mutation (A290D) in *wspA*, activating cyclic-di-GMP biofilm pathways, and RNA-seq revealed 220 differentially expressed genes including upregulation of *rhlI*, *pqsH*, *nir*, *norCB*, and the *pel* operon.

Study limitations

- Only two reference strains (PAO1, ATCC 25923) were used — clinical isolate diversity is not represented. - The ecological relevance of metabolite concentrations used in vitro (subinhibitory, 30-day exposure) to real-world human or environmental exposures is not established. - The study is largely mechanistic and does not include in vivo validation of resistance or persistence outcomes.

Clinical implications

Ciprofloxacin metabolites excreted after antibiotic use may independently drive resistance and biofilm adaptation in key pathogens, even at concentrations too low to kill bacteria. Clinicians and stewardship programs should consider the broader ecological footprint of fluoroquinolone metabolites, particularly in environments with chronic or recurrent ciprofloxacin exposure.

Caveats

  • No sample size (N) is applicable in the traditional sense — this is a laboratory strain study using bacterial reference strains, not human subjects.
  • Publication date (2026-07-29) is in the future relative to most training data but consistent with today's date provided (September 3, 2026).
  • The clinical implications suggested by the authors are speculative and require in vivo or epidemiological validation.
Show all 4
  • The study design is in vitro only; level of evidence is set to 6 (laboratory/bench study) accordingly.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How do subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations promote resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms?What is the clinical significance of ciprofloxacin metabolites in chronic or recurrent infections?How does cyclic-di-GMP signalling drive biofilm formation and antibiotic tolerance in P. aeruginosa?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next