ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. EASL-EASD-EASO guidance on the use of re…

EASL-EASD-EASO guidance on the use of resmetirom and semaglutide as MASH-targeted therapy

Journal of Hepatology·September 29Open Access
Gastroenterology & HepatologyPractice changingCardiovascular DiseaseHepatic FibrosisMetabolic Dysfunction-Associated SteatohepatitisMetabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver DiseaseObesityType 2 DiabetesClinical Practice GuidelineGLP-1 Receptor AgonistThyroid Hormone Receptor Beta AgonistAdultRezdiffraWegovyResmetiromSemaglutide

Summary

View source

What was studied

This joint EASL-EASD-EASO guidance evaluates the use of resmetirom (80mg/100mg orally) and semaglutide (2.4mg subcutaneously weekly) as MASH-targeted therapies in adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and fibrosis stages 2–3, covering patient selection, treatment initiation, monitoring, and discontinuation.

Key findings

Both agents are recommended for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH (fibrosis F2–F3) alongside lifestyle intervention; semaglutide is preferred when obesity, type 2 diabetes, or established cardiovascular disease is present, while resmetirom is prioritized in those without obesity or who are already on or intolerant to GLP-1RAs. Neither agent should be used as MASH-targeted therapy in cirrhosis until further data are available.

Study limitations

Recommendations are based on regulatory approval data and expert consensus; long-term effectiveness data reducing major adverse liver-related outcomes (MALO) are still pending from ongoing trials. Evidence supporting use in MASH cirrhosis remains insufficient.

Clinical implications

In adults with MASH and fibrosis F2–F3 (confirmed by NITs such as VCTE 10–20 kPa, MRE 3.1–5.0 kPa, or ELF 9.8–11.3, or biopsy), initiate pharmacotherapy alongside lifestyle intervention and optimize comorbidities. Choose semaglutide for patients with obesity, T2D, or high cardiovascular risk, and resmetirom for those without obesity or who cannot tolerate GLP-1RAs; monitor for nutritional status and sarcopenia during semaglutide use.

Caveats

  • Long-term data on reduction of hard liver endpoints (cirrhosis, liver cancer, transplantation) for both agents are still awaited from ongoing studies, so benefit-risk estimates may change
  • The guidance explicitly advises against using either agent as MASH-targeted therapy in cirrhosis, but safety data in that population remain limited
  • This is an expert consensus guidance document, not a systematic review or meta-analysis; individual recommendations are based on regulatory data and expert opinion rather than head-to-head trial evidence

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How do VCTE, MRE, and ELF score compare for identifying high-risk MASH patients who need pharmacotherapy?What are the cardiovascular and renal outcomes of semaglutide 2.4mg in patients with MASH and established cardiovascular disease?Long-term liver-related outcomes of resmetirom in non-cirrhotic MASH fibrosis stage 2-3

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Hepatology
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next