ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Infertility etiology, assisted reproduction, and occurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a cohort study
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Infertility etiology, assisted reproduct…

Infertility etiology, assisted reproduction, and occurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a cohort study

Pregnancy Hypertension·September 12Open Access
Obstetrics & GynecologyConfirms priorEndometriosisHypertensive Disorders Of PregnancyInfertilityMale Factor InfertilityOvulatory DisordersTubal DiseaseCohort StudyAssisted Reproductive TechnologyAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This cohort study examined whether the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) differs by infertility etiology and fertility treatment type (ART vs. non-ART vs. untreated) among 6,273 infertility-evaluated women compared with 10,810 unexposed women who gave birth in Quebec between 1996 and 2017.

Key findings

Ovulatory disorders and tubal disease were independently associated with higher HDP occurrence; ART was associated with higher HDP risk across most infertility diagnoses; endometriosis raised HDP risk only in ART-treated pregnancies; and the ovulatory disorder–HDP link persisted regardless of treatment type or multiplicity.

Study limitations

Administrative health data may misclassify infertility diagnoses or HDP; the unexposed group was defined by absence of recent medical infertility history rather than confirmed fertility, introducing potential selection bias; and residual confounding from unmeasured factors (e.g., BMI, parity history) cannot be excluded.

Clinical implications

Women conceiving via ART or with ovulatory disorders or tubal disease should be flagged as higher risk for HDP regardless of treatment path. Closer blood pressure monitoring throughout pregnancy is warranted in these groups, as the underlying biology—not just the treatment—appears to drive part of the risk.

Caveats

  • BMI and parity—key HDP confounders—were not reported as adjusted covariates, raising the possibility of residual confounding.
  • Specific HDP subtypes (e.g., preeclampsia vs. gestational hypertension) are not distinguished in the reported results, limiting clinical granularity.
  • The unexposed comparator group was defined administratively (no recent infertility history), not by confirmed fertility, which may underestimate true between-group differences.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

Which infertility diagnoses carry the highest risk of preeclampsia in ART pregnancies?Does frozen vs. fresh embryo transfer affect risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy?How should blood pressure surveillance differ for IVF pregnancies versus natural conception?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Pregnancy Hypertension
Sample Size
n=17,083
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next