ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Tofacitinib Reduces KL-6 Levels in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. Results Of A Phase II Investigator-Initiated Study.
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Tofacitinib Reduces KL-6 Levels in Patie…

Tofacitinib Reduces KL-6 Levels in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. Results Of A Phase II Investigator-Initiated Study.

Respiratory Medicine·September 10
Respiratory SystemSafety signalProgressive Pulmonary FibrosisRheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung DiseasePhase II Non-Randomized Interventional TrialAntifibrotic AgentJAK InhibitorAdultOfevXeljanzNintedanibTofacitinib

Summary

View source

What was studied

This Phase II investigator-initiated trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of tofacitinib 5 mg BID over 48 weeks in 39 patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD), with KL-6 as a serum biomarker of lung disease activity.

Key findings

92% of patients experienced at least one adverse event (most commonly upper airway infections); 3 patients died; 15 patients (38.5/100 patient-years) met the combined endpoint of mortality and/or progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). FVC declined by a mean of -72 mL at 48 weeks. KL-6 fell from a baseline LSM of 34,358 mU/mL to 32,191 mU/mL (LSM decline of -2,167 mU/mL). At 48 weeks, 51% of patients achieved low disease activity by SDAI.

Study limitations

- Small sample (n=39) limits power to detect efficacy signals beyond biomarker trends. - No control arm; observed changes in FVC and KL-6 cannot be attributed solely to tofacitinib. - Nine patients also received nintedanib during the trial, introducing potential confounding despite subgroup analysis.

Clinical implications

Tofacitinib carries a high adverse-event burden in RA-ILD (92%), and nearly 40% of patients still progressed or died at 48 weeks — clinicians should weigh this risk carefully. The decline in KL-6 levels may support its use as a monitoring biomarker in this population, but efficacy conclusions require confirmation in a controlled trial.

Caveats

  • KL-6 units appear inconsistently reported in the abstract (mU/mL at baseline, mU/L for the decline) — this likely reflects a transcription error in the source text.
  • Nine patients received concomitant nintedanib, which may confound both safety and biomarker outcomes despite subgroup analysis.
  • No control/placebo arm was included; efficacy conclusions (FVC decline, KL-6 reduction) are descriptive only and cannot establish causation.
Show all 4
  • Study design is described as Phase II investigator-initiated without randomization — closest label is a single-arm interventional trial; study design tag reflects this.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the safety profile of JAK inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease?How does KL-6 perform as a biomarker for monitoring disease progression in RA-ILD?What are the current treatment options for progressive pulmonary fibrosis in rheumatoid arthritis?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Respiratory Medicine
Sample Size
n=39
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next