ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Clinician perspectives on specialist perinatal mental health service care pathways: An integrative review
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Clinician perspectives on specialist per…

Clinician perspectives on specialist perinatal mental health service care pathways: An integrative review

Women and Birth·September 1Open Access
Obstetrics & GynecologyLimited evidencePerinatal Mental HealthIntegrative Systematic ReviewAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This integrative review synthesised clinician perspectives on specialist perinatal mental health (PMH) service care pathways, drawing from 35 studies identified across six international databases (no date, language, or geographic limits) using PRISMA guidelines and Whittemore & Knafl's framework.

Key findings

Three themes emerged: (1) pathways are highly criteria-driven with complex referral processes and service gaps that risk women being 'lost between services'; (2) structural and relational factors consistently shape accessibility, engagement, and inclusion; and (3) perspectives on service integration highlight the need for open communication and clear, coordinated pathways — especially for women with complex needs and minority groups.

Study limitations

Only clinician perspectives were synthesised, excluding patient/family voices. The full text was not accessible, limiting appraisal of individual study quality. Narrative synthesis (vs. meta-analysis) limits precision of findings.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should advocate for flexible, culturally sensitive, and trauma-informed PMH pathways that reduce rigid criteria barriers and ensure seamless handoffs between services. Particular attention is needed for women with complex needs and those from minority groups, who are most at risk of falling through gaps in care.

Caveats

  • Full text was not accessible — publisher page returned a CAPTCHA block; summary is based solely on the abstract and methods sections.
  • Publication date (2026-09-01) is future-dated relative to the current date; this may reflect an ahead-of-print or early access article.
  • Study design labelled as 'Integrative Systematic Review' rather than a standard systematic review or meta-analysis — evidence level assigned accordingly.
Show all 4
  • The sample size tag (n=35) refers to included studies in the review, not individual participants; total participant count across studies is not reported.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What are the barriers clinicians face when referring women to specialist perinatal mental health services?How do care pathways affect equity and access for minority women in perinatal mental health?What models of integrated perinatal mental health care improve outcomes for women with complex needs?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Women and Birth
Sample Size
n=35
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next