ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Iberdomide plus daratumumab and dexamethasone versus daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (EXCALIBER-RRMM): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Iberdomide plus daratumumab and dexameth…

Iberdomide plus daratumumab and dexamethasone versus daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (EXCALIBER-RRMM): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

The Lancet Oncology·September 25
OncologyPractice changingRelapsed Or Refractory Multiple MyelomaRandomized Controlled TrialAnti-CD38 AntibodyCereblon E3 Ligase ModulatorCorticosteroidProteasome InhibitorAdultOlder AdultDarzalexVelcadeBortezomibDaratumumabDexamethasoneIberdomide

Summary

View source

What was studied

This phase 3 RCT (EXCALIBER-RRMM) compared iberdomide + daratumumab + dexamethasone (Iber-Dara-Dex) vs. daratumumab + bortezomib + dexamethasone (DVd) in adults with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (1–2 prior lines) over a median 15.7 months of follow-up, with MRD-negative complete response and progression-free survival as dual primary endpoints.

Key findings

MRD-negative complete response was achieved in 41% (85/207) with Iber-Dara-Dex vs. 21% (44/213) with DVd (stratified difference 20.1%, 95% CI 11.5–28.6, p<0.0001; OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.8–4.3); however, progression-free survival data are not yet mature.

Study limitations

Progression-free survival (the second co-primary endpoint) remains immature and pending; the open-label design introduces potential bias; and patients with anti-CD38- or bortezomib-refractory disease were excluded, limiting generalizability to heavily pre-treated or refractory populations.

Clinical implications

Iberdomide + daratumumab + dexamethasone roughly doubles the rate of MRD-negative complete response versus the DVd standard in 1–2 prior line RRMM, but clinicians should anticipate substantially higher rates of grade 3–4 neutropenia (84% vs. 11%) and serious infections including pneumonia (18% vs. 6%), requiring proactive monitoring and supportive care.

Caveats

  • Grade 3–4 neutropenia was markedly higher in the Iber-Dara-Dex arm (84%) vs. DVd (11%), and serious pneumonia events were nearly three times more frequent (18% vs. 6%); the benefit-risk balance requires careful patient selection and infection prophylaxis planning
  • Patients with anti-CD38-refractory or bortezomib-refractory disease were excluded, and the median patient age was 68 years with an ECOG PS of 0–2, which may not reflect real-world heavily pre-treated or frail myeloma populations
  • The primary MRD-negative CR analysis is based on the first 420 patients only; the progression-free survival co-primary endpoint is still maturing in the 800-patient confirmatory cohort, so overall clinical benefit is not yet fully established

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the progression-free survival outcome for iberdomide plus daratumumab and dexamethasone in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma?How does iberdomide compare to lenalidomide or pomalidomide in combination regimens for multiple myeloma?What supportive care strategies reduce neutropenia and infection risk with iberdomide-based regimens in myeloma?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Lancet Oncology
Sample Size
n=420
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next