ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Mepolizumab effectiveness for patients with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Italy (MEPOREAL): a real-life, multicentre, phase 4 trial
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Mepolizumab effectiveness for patients w…

Mepolizumab effectiveness for patients with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Italy (MEPOREAL): a real-life, multicentre, phase 4 trial

The Lancet Respiratory Medicine·August 18
Respiratory SystemConfirms priorAsthmaChronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal PolypsNSAID-Exacerbated Respiratory DiseasePhase 4 Real-World Evidence StudyAnti-IL-5 Monoclonal AntibodyAdultNucalaMepolizumab

Summary

View source

What was studied

This real-life, multicentre, ambispective phase 4 study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab 100 mg every 4 weeks in 621 adults with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) across 25 Italian tertiary rhinology centres over 12 months.

Key findings

At 12 months, both nasal polyp score and SNOT-22 dropped significantly from baseline (p<0.0001); disease control was achieved in 42% (206/519) of patients, and 20% (104/519) were on the way to remission. However, 38% (186/495) of patients remained anosmic. Adverse events occurred in only 5% (29/621) of patients, mostly grade 1.

Study limitations

- Ambispective design (partly retrospective) with no control arm limits causal inference. - Study limited to Italian tertiary centres, which may reduce generalisability to other settings or less-severe populations. - Only 12-month data are presented; remission requires a full 12-month sustained period, so true remission rates cannot yet be determined.

Clinical implications

Mepolizumab produces meaningful, progressive improvements in polyp burden and quality of life over 12 months in severe CRSwNP, with a good safety profile, but nearly 4 in 10 patients remain anosmic at one year. Patients with lower baseline nasal polyp scores are most likely to progress toward remission, which may help guide expectations when counselling patients.

Caveats

  • 'On the way to remission' is a surrogate endpoint defined by the authors and may not align with established remission definitions used in other trials.
  • The phase 4 label refers to a post-marketing study; however, the lack of a comparator arm means it functions as a single-arm observational study rather than a traditional controlled trial.
  • The study is ambispective (partly retrospective), so baseline data completeness may vary across centres. Denominators differ across outcomes (e.g., n=519 for disease control vs. n=621 enrolled), suggesting some missing follow-up data.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does mepolizumab compare to dupilumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps?What predicts remission in patients with severe CRSwNP on biologic therapy?Which biologics are most effective for CRSwNP patients with comorbid asthma and NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Sample Size
n=621
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next