ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Once-weekly IcoSema versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes management (COMBINE 4): an open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, randomised, phase 3b trial
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Once-weekly IcoSema versus once-daily in…

Once-weekly IcoSema versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes management (COMBINE 4): an open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, randomised, phase 3b trial

The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology·August 13
Endocrinology & MetabolismPractice changingType 2 DiabetesRandomized Controlled TrialBasal InsulinBasal Insulin / GLP-1 Receptor Agonist CombinationAdultIcoSemaToujeoInsulin GlargineInsulin Icodec / Semaglutide

Summary

View source

What was studied

This 40-week, open-label, phase 3b RCT (COMBINE 4) compared once-weekly IcoSema (basal insulin icodec + semaglutide) vs. once-daily insulin glargine U100 in 485 insulin-naive adults with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥8.0%) inadequately controlled on oral glucose-lowering medications across 97 sites in 9 countries.

Key findings

IcoSema was superior on both primary and secondary endpoints: HbA1c dropped 3.32 vs. 2.44 percentage points (ETD −0.88 pp; p<0.001), bodyweight fell 0.79 kg vs. rose 3.81 kg (ETD −4.61 kg; p<0.001), and clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia was lower with IcoSema (0.29 vs. 0.59 episodes/person-year; rate ratio 0.56; p=0.04). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common with IcoSema.

Study limitations

Open-label design may introduce bias in patient-reported outcomes. No active GLP-1 receptor agonist comparator arm was included, limiting head-to-head context against other combination approaches. The 40-week duration does not capture long-term cardiovascular or renal outcomes.

Clinical implications

For insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on oral agents, once-weekly IcoSema offers greater HbA1c reduction, weight loss rather than gain, and fewer hypoglycaemic events compared with once-daily glargine U100. Clinicians should counsel patients to expect GI side effects, consistent with GLP-1 receptor agonist use.

Caveats

  • IcoSema is not yet approved in all markets as of the paper's publication date (August 2026); regulatory status should be verified before clinical application.
  • Open-label design is a key risk of bias; the paper acknowledges this implicitly in its design description.
  • The brand tag 'Toujeo' was removed — glargine U100 refers to Lantus, not Toujeo (which is U300); the correct brand is Lantus but it was not explicitly named in the abstract, so no brand tag for glargine was emitted.
Show all 4
  • The comparator is insulin glargine U100 only — no comparison to GLP-1 monotherapy or other basal-bolus regimens was made.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does IcoSema compare to other once-weekly basal insulin combinations in type 2 diabetes?What are the gastrointestinal side effect rates with GLP-1 receptor agonist and basal insulin combinations?When should I consider switching insulin-naive type 2 diabetes patients from oral agents directly to a GLP-1/basal insulin co-formulation?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Lancet Diabetes &amp; Endocrinology
Sample Size
n=485
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next