ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Aspirin for cancer prevention in individuals with Lynch syndrome: first results from the CaPP3 multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Aspirin for cancer prevention in individ…

Aspirin for cancer prevention in individuals with Lynch syndrome: first results from the CaPP3 multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial

The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology·July 9Open Access
Gastroenterology & HepatologyPractice changingColorectal CancerLynch SyndromeRandomized Controlled TrialAntiplatelet AgentAdultAspirin

Summary

View source

What was studied

CaPP3 compared daily aspirin at 100 mg and 300 mg vs. 600 mg (the CAPP2 proven dose) for prevention of Lynch syndrome cancers in 1,866 adults with Lynch syndrome across 5 countries, over a median follow-up of 66.4 months (blinded for 2 years, then open-label for 3 years).

Key findings

Formal non-inferiority vs. 600 mg was not established for either lower dose. However, 100 mg showed nearly identical cancer risk to 600 mg (ITT HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.67–1.42]; IRR 0.94 [95% CI 0.65–1.38]) with fewer adverse events: serious bleeding occurred in 0 patients on 100 mg vs. 11 (1.5%) on 600 mg (p=0.004).

Study limitations

- Non-inferiority was not formally met for 100 mg in the per-protocol analysis for time to first cancer (HR upper CI 1.63 exceeds the 1.5 boundary). - High dropout rate: 39% stopped aspirin within the 2-year blinded phase, limiting per-protocol power. - Compliance was self-reported, introducing potential misclassification bias.

Clinical implications

For Lynch syndrome carriers, 100 mg daily aspirin appears to offer similar cancer protection to 600 mg with a markedly better safety profile — no serious bleeding events vs. 1.5% on 600 mg. Clinicians may consider 100 mg as the preferred dose pending longer follow-up data.

Caveats

  • Non-inferiority was not formally established for either 100 mg or 300 mg vs. 600 mg by the pre-specified criteria; the 'practice-changing' flag reflects the clinically meaningful safety signal and near-identical point estimates for 100 mg, not a definitive statistical conclusion.
  • The trial used a non-inferiority margin of HR/IRR upper 95% CI < 1.5; the 100 mg per-protocol HR upper CI of 1.63 narrowly missed this threshold, so caution is warranted in interpreting the 100 mg result as confirmed equivalent.
  • UK open-label phase used 75 mg instead of 100 mg aspirin, introducing a minor dose inconsistency across countries in the unblinded period.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What dose of aspirin is recommended for Lynch syndrome cancer prevention?How does aspirin reduce colorectal cancer risk in mismatch repair deficiency?Safety and bleeding risk of long-term low-dose aspirin in hereditary cancer syndromes

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Lancet Gastroenterology &amp; Hepatology
Sample Size
n=1,866
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next