JAMA Dermatology

<jats:sec id="ab-dbr230019-4"><jats:title>Importance</jats:title><jats:p>Little is known about the prevalence and magnitude of stigmatizing attitudes of the general public toward individuals with acne.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-dbr230019-5"><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To explore the degree of stigma toward individuals with acne and whether these attitudes vary based on characteristics of the individuals with acne or of the survey participants.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-dbr230019-6"><jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants</jats:title><jats:p>In this cross-sectional internet survey study, 4 stock portraits of adults that varied in sex (male/female) and skin tone (light/dark) were digitally enhanced to have acne (mild/severe). One of these 12 images was randomly presented to survey participants, who subsequently answered questions regarding stigmatizing attitudes with respect to the pictured individual, such as desire for social distance and stereotype endorsement. The survey was administered to a convenience sample of adult respondents in the US who were volunteers on the ResearchMatch platform.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-dbr230019-7"><jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures</jats:title><jats:p>Prevalence and magnitude of stigma toward individuals with acne.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-dbr230019-8"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The survey was completed by 1357 respondents (65.7% completion rate) (mean [SD] age, 42.4 [14.3] years; 918 [67.7%] female, 439 [32.4%] male). Compared to those with no acne, for those with severe acne, participants reported less comfort being friends (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], −0.28 [−0.47 to −0.10]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .003), hiring (−0.33 [−0.51 to −0.15]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001), having physical contact (−0.26 [−0.45 to −0.08]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .006), dating (−0.44 [−0.74 to −0.14]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .004), and posting a photograph together on social media (−0.50 [−0.70 to −0.30]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). Compared to those with no acne, participants were more likely to rate individuals with severe acne as having poor hygiene (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], −1.04 [−1.46 to −0.82]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001) and being unattractive (−0.89 [−1.12 to −0.67]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001), unintelligent (−0.42 [−0.63 to −0.22]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001), unlikable (−0.36 [−0.56 to −0.15]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001), immature (−0.52 [−0.74 to −0.30]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001), and untrustworthy (−0.40 [−0.61 to −0.18]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). There was evidence that the effect size of the association of acne with desire to social distance was greater for individuals with dark skin.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-dbr230019-9"><jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance</jats:title><jats:p>This survey study demonstrates that stigmatizing attitudes toward patients with acne existed across a variety of social and professional scenarios, with severe acne and acne in darker skin tone being associated with a greater degree of stigma. These findings highlight the need to identify approaches to reduce stigmatizing attitudes in the community and for adequate access to care, which might prevent negative downstream effects related to these stigmatizing attitudes.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Skin disease and stigma in emerging adulthood: impact on healthy development.

J Cutan Med Surg

Stigma predicts health-related quality of life impairment, psychological distress, and somatic symptoms in acne sufferers.

PLoS One

More than skin deep: a survey of real-life experiences of acne vulgaris.

Br J Dermatol

Stigmatizing attitudes toward persons with psoriasis among laypersons and medical students.

J Am Acad Dermatol

Evaluation of stigma toward individuals with alopecia.

JAMA Dermatol

How people with facial acne scars are perceived in society: an online survey.

Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)

Double standards and inconsistencies in access to care—what constitutes a cosmetic treatment?

Association of race/ethnicity and sex with differences in health care use and treatment for acne.

Racial and ethnic differences in barriers to care among US adults with chronic inflammatory skin diseases: a cross-sectional study of the All of Us Research Program.

Little is known about the prevalence and magnitude of stigmatizing attitudes of the general public toward individuals with acne.
To explore the degree of stigma toward individuals with acne and whether these attitudes vary based on characteristics of the individuals with acne or of the survey participants.
In this cross-sectional internet survey study, 4 stock portraits of adults that varied in sex (male/female) and skin tone (light/dark) were digitally enhanced to have acne (mild/severe). One of these 12 images was randomly presented to survey participants, who subsequently answered questions regarding stigmatizing attitudes with respect to the pictured individual, such as desire for social distance and stereotype endorsement. The survey was administered to a convenience sample of adult respondents in the US who were volunteers on the ResearchMatch platform.
Prevalence and magnitude of stigma toward individuals with acne.
The survey was completed by 1357 respondents (65.7% completion rate) (mean [SD] age, 42.4 [14.3] years; 918 [67.7%] female, 439 [32.4%] male). Compared to those with no acne, for those with severe acne, participants reported less comfort being friends (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], -0.28 [-0.47 to -0.10]; P = .003), hiring (-0.33 [-0.51 to -0.15]; P < .001), having physical contact (-0.26 [-0.45 to -0.08]; P = .006), dating (-0.44 [-0.74 to -0.14]; P = .004), and posting a photograph together on social media (-0.50 [-0.70 to -0.30]; P < .001). Compared to those with no acne, participants were more likely to rate individuals with severe acne as having poor hygiene (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], -1.04 [-1.46 to -0.82]; P < .001) and being unattractive (-0.89 [-1.12 to -0.67]; P < .001), unintelligent (-0.42 [-0.63 to -0.22]; P < .001), unlikable (-0.36 [-0.56 to -0.15]; P < .001), immature (-0.52 [-0.74 to -0.30]; P < .001), and untrustworthy (-0.40 [-0.61 to -0.18]; P < .001). There was evidence that the effect size of the association of acne with desire to social distance was greater for individuals with dark skin.
This survey study demonstrates that stigmatizing attitudes toward patients with acne existed across a variety of social and professional scenarios, with severe acne and acne in darker skin tone being associated with a greater degree of stigma. These findings highlight the need to identify approaches to reduce stigmatizing attitudes in the community and for adequate access to care, which might prevent negative downstream effects related to these stigmatizing attitudes.

Evaluation of Stigma Toward Individuals With Acne.

Evaluation of Stigma Toward Individuals With Acne

Evaluation of Stigma Toward Individuals With Acne

Clinical Summary

What was studied

Key findings

Study limitations

Clinical implications

Related Questions