ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. A 14-Day Self-help Internet-Based Cognit…

A 14-Day Self-help Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral therapy for Social Anxiety College Students: Randomized Controlled Evidence and Exploratory Cross-Study Comparison

Cognitive Therapy and Research·July 25
Psychology, ClinicalLimited evidenceSocial Anxiety DisorderRandomized Controlled TrialInternet-Based Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAdolescentAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

A 14-day fully self-help internet-based CBT (iCBT) program was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial of 61 university students with subclinical social anxiety, compared to a waitlist control, with assessments at pre/post, Days 6 and 10, and 1-month follow-up.

Key findings

iCBT produced significantly greater reductions in social anxiety and psychological distress vs. waitlist (large effect sizes, though likely inflated by the waitlist comparator); negative affect decreased significantly; positive affect did not change. Most gains held at 1-month follow-up. Retention was high: 57 of 61 participants completed.

Study limitations

- Waitlist comparator likely inflates effect sizes; no active control. - Intermediate and follow-up assessments lacked a control group, making timing-of-change findings purely descriptive. - Cross-study comparison with a prior VRET intervention was non-randomized and cross-sample, so no superiority claims are valid.

Clinical implications

A 14-day self-help iCBT program may offer a scalable, low-barrier option for college students with subclinical social anxiety, but direct comparisons with active treatments and dedicated feasibility outcomes are still needed before broad rollout.

Caveats

  • Sample is subclinical social anxiety only — findings may not generalize to clinical social anxiety disorder. The age_group tag reflects a college/university population that spans both late adolescence and young adulthood. The sample size tag uses the analyzed N (57); 61 were randomized. Effect sizes should be interpreted cautiously given the passive waitlist comparator. The cross-study VRET comparison is exploratory and non-randomized; no head-to-head conclusions are supported.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the evidence for self-help iCBT versus therapist-guided iCBT for social anxiety in college students?How does virtual reality exposure therapy compare to internet-based CBT for social anxiety?What are the most effective digital mental health interventions for subclinical anxiety in university students?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Sample Size
n=57
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next