ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Compassionate and Uncompassionate Self-r…

Compassionate and Uncompassionate Self-responding and Disordered Eating in Sexual and Gender Diverse Adults

Mindfulness·July 20Open Access
Psychology, ClinicalSafety signalCompensatory BehaviorsDepressive SymptomsDisordered EatingLoss Of Control EatingCross-Sectional StudyMindfulness-Based InterventionSelf-Compassion InterventionAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This cross-sectional study examined how compassionate self-responding (CSR) and uncompassionate self-responding (USR) relate to—and moderate the link between depressive symptoms and—loss of control (LOC) eating and compensatory behaviors in 915 racially/ethnically diverse sexual and gender diverse (SGD) adults in the USA (mean age 36.7 years), using data collected via Qualtrics Panels in 2021.

Key findings

USR was strongly associated with more frequent LOC eating across the full sample and all SGD subgroups (IRR = 1.97, p = 0.001) and with compensatory behaviors in sexually diverse cisgender women (IRR = 1.25, p = 0.02). CSR was generally not associated with either disordered eating behavior. Unexpectedly, **high CSR exacerbated** (rather than buffered) the link between depressive symptoms and compensatory behaviors in the full sample (IRR = 1.01, p = 0.007) and in several subgroups (cisgender women, cisgender men, bisexual, and gay individuals).

Study limitations

- Cross-sectional design prevents causal or temporal inferences. - All measures were self-report, raising risk of common method bias. - Gender diverse subgroups were collapsed due to recruitment difficulties, and several racial/ethnic groups (Asian American, Pacific Islander, Indigenous) were absent.

Clinical implications

In SGD patients presenting with disordered eating, targeting self-critical and isolating thought patterns (USR) may be more clinically useful than simply promoting self-compassion, as higher CSR did not reduce—and in some groups amplified—the depression–compensatory behavior link. Clinicians should assess USR specifically rather than relying on composite self-compassion scores when evaluating eating disorder risk in SGD populations.

Caveats

  • Several racial/ethnic groups (Asian American, Pacific Islander, Indigenous) were not represented, limiting generalizability.
  • The heterosexual subgroup (n=62) was composed entirely of gender diverse individuals due to study design exclusions, limiting generalizability of subgroup findings for that group.
  • The study was not preregistered, and multiple subgroup tests were conducted, increasing risk of type I error despite Benjamini–Hochberg correction.
Show all 4
  • The unexpected finding that high CSR exacerbated the depression–compensatory behavior link is counterintuitive and may reflect cultural differences in how SGD individuals interpret self-compassion items; replication in prospective or EMA designs is needed before clinical translation.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

How does self-criticism versus self-compassion affect binge eating and purging in LGBTQ+ patients?What are the most effective eating disorder interventions for sexual and gender minority adults?Does self-compassion training reduce disordered eating in gender diverse populations?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Mindfulness
Sample Size
n=915
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next