ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Connectivity- and frequency-individualized accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: A randomized controlled trial
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Connectivity- and frequency-individualiz…

Connectivity- and frequency-individualized accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: A randomized controlled trial

Journal of Affective Disorders·September 16
PsychiatryLimited evidenceTreatment-Resistant DepressionRandomized Controlled TrialNeuroimaging-Guided NeuromodulationTheta Burst StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This 3-arm randomized controlled trial tested two forms of personalized accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) — fMRI-connectivity-individualized and EEG+fMRI frequency/connectivity-individualized — versus sham in 51 adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), delivering 10 sessions/day for 5 days with follow-up at 1 and 4 weeks post-treatment.

Key findings

Neither active aiTBS arm (fMRI-individualized or EEG+fMRI-individualized) showed significant improvement in depression severity (MADRS) or anhedonia (DARS) compared to sham at 1 week post-treatment; remission and response rates also did not differ between arms.

Study limitations

Small sample size (43 per-protocol completers across 3 arms) limits statistical power; the trial was conducted at a single center, and overall therapeutic effects were described as 'muted,' raising questions about whether the sham condition itself was partly therapeutic or whether TRD patients in this sample had particularly refractory illness.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should not yet adopt rs-fMRI- or EEG-personalized aiTBS as a superior alternative to standard TBS protocols for TRD; further larger trials are needed to determine whether individualization of target site and stimulation frequency confers meaningful clinical benefit.

Caveats

  • Overall therapeutic benefit was muted across all arms including sham, which may reflect unusually refractory patients or non-specific effects of the intensive protocol rather than true treatment equivalence
  • Sex breakdown of participants is not reported in the abstract, limiting assessment of potential sex-related differential responses
  • The per-protocol sample was only 43 patients across 3 arms (~14 per arm), which is underpowered to detect modest treatment effects and increases the risk of a false-negative result

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the efficacy of accelerated TMS protocols compared to standard TMS for treatment-resistant depression?How does resting-state fMRI targeting improve TMS outcomes in depression?What EEG biomarkers predict response to theta burst stimulation in treatment-resistant depression?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Affective Disorders
Sample Size
n=51
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next