ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
Durvalumab and tremelimumab, with or without lenvatinib, combined with transarterial chemoembolisation in participants with embolisation-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma (EMERALD-3): a global, randomised, open-label, sponsor-blinded, phase 3 study
Back to Research Hub
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Durvalumab and tremelimumab, with or wit…

Durvalumab and tremelimumab, with or without lenvatinib, combined with transarterial chemoembolisation in participants with embolisation-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma (EMERALD-3): a global, randomised, open-label, sponsor-blinded, phase 3 study

The Lancet Oncology·August 24
OncologyPractice changingHepatocellular CarcinomaRandomized Controlled TrialCTLA-4 InhibitorPD-L1 InhibitorTransarterial ChemoembolisationTyrosine Kinase InhibitorAdultImfinziDurvalumabLenvatinibTremelimumab

Summary

View source

What was studied

This phase 3 RCT (EMERALD-3) evaluated STRIDE (single-dose tremelimumab 300 mg + durvalumab 1500 mg, then durvalumab every 4 weeks), with or without lenvatinib, combined with TACE versus TACE alone in 760 adults with embolisation-eligible HCC not amenable to curative therapy, across 177 sites in 21 countries.

Key findings

STRIDE + lenvatinib + TACE significantly improved median PFS vs TACE alone (13.0 vs 9.8 months; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57–0.86; p=0.0007), but median OS did not reach statistical significance (39.5 vs 34.7 months; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.65–1.09; p=0.18). STRIDE + TACE also improved PFS vs TACE (12.9 vs 8.1 months; HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56–0.91). Serious adverse events were more common in combination arms (64% and 51%) than TACE alone (23%); treatment-related deaths occurred in 7 (2%) patients on STRIDE + lenvatinib + TACE.

Study limitations

- OS data are immature (final analysis pending); the OS result did not reach statistical significance at interim analysis. - Open-label design with sponsor blinding only may introduce performance or assessment bias. - TACE technique and number of procedures were left to investigator discretion, introducing heterogeneity.

Clinical implications

STRIDE + lenvatinib + TACE improves PFS in embolisation-eligible HCC and may represent a new combination option, but the OS benefit is not yet confirmed — clinicians should weigh this against a meaningfully higher serious adverse event burden (64% vs 23%) and treatment-related mortality risk before routine adoption.

Caveats

  • Brand tag 'Imfinzi' applies to durvalumab; tremelimumab's brand name (Imjudo) was not mentioned in the source text and was therefore omitted.
  • OS data are immature at time of publication — the primary PFS endpoint was met but OS did not reach statistical significance; final OS analysis is ongoing.
  • TACE procedures were not standardised (technique and frequency per investigator discretion), which may limit generalisability and introduces heterogeneity across sites.
Show all 4
  • The 'practice_changing' flag is applied cautiously: PFS improvement is statistically significant, but confirmed OS benefit is absent at this interim analysis.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

What is the current evidence for combining immunotherapy with TACE in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma?How does durvalumab plus tremelimumab STRIDE regimen compare to other immunotherapy combinations in HCC?What are the safety signals and management strategies for immune-related adverse events when adding checkpoint inhibitors to TACE in HCC?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
The Lancet Oncology
Sample Size
n=760
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next