ReachRxResearch
Home
Research
Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Research Hub
  3. Gut microbiota signatures associated wit…

Gut microbiota signatures associated with spermatogenic capacity and sperm retrieval outcomes in non-obstructive azoospermia

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics·August 22Open Access
Obstetrics & GynecologyLimited evidenceMale InfertilityNon-Obstructive AzoospermiaObstructive AzoospermiaProspective Cohort StudyGut Microbiome ProfilingMicrodissection Testicular Sperm ExtractionAdult

Summary

View source

What was studied

This prospective cohort study profiled gut microbiota (full-length 16S rRNA, PacBio) in 39 azoospermic men (OA n=14, NOA n=25) and evaluated whether microbial signatures were associated with successful sperm retrieval after microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE).

Key findings

NOA patients had reduced Bacteroidota (23.5% vs 28.5%, p<0.001) and elevated Proteobacteria (9.7% vs 3.8%, p<0.001) vs OA. Within NOA, successful retrieval (52%, 13/25) was linked to a higher Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidota ratio (AUC 0.76; 76.9% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity at cutoff ≥2.20) and enrichment of *Finegoldia magna* (AUC 0.756; 100% specificity at abundance ≥8.7%, though sensitivity was only 46.2%).

Study limitations

- Small sample (n=39 total; n=25 NOA) limits statistical power and generalizability. - Single timepoint 16S rRNA sequencing cannot assess functional capacity (no metagenomics or metabolomics) or temporal stability of microbiota. - Single Taiwanese tertiary center cohort; ROC cutoffs are hypothesis-generating only, with no external validation.

Clinical implications

Gut microbiota profiling is not ready for clinical use in NOA counseling, but these exploratory findings suggest the Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidota ratio and *Finegoldia magna* abundance warrant further study as non-invasive correlates of mTESE success. Clinicians should await validation in larger, multicenter cohorts before applying any microbiota-based thresholds.

Caveats

  • All participants were recruited from a single center in Taiwan; findings may not generalize to other ethnicities or dietary backgrounds.
  • Observational design with single-timepoint sampling cannot establish whether microbiota differences cause, result from, or merely accompany the underlying testicular phenotype.
  • The role of Finegoldia magna in spermatogenesis is entirely novel and biologically uncharacterized; no causal mechanism has been established.
Show all 4
  • The study is exploratory and underpowered (n=25 NOA); all ROC cutoffs should be considered hypothesis-generating only. Wide confidence intervals (e.g., AUC 95% CI 0.544–0.934 for F/B ratio) reflect this uncertainty.

Related Questions

Explore related topics

Can gut microbiota composition predict mTESE success in non-obstructive azoospermia?What is the role of the gut-testis axis in male infertility and spermatogenesis?How does Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidota ratio relate to male reproductive outcomes?

Publication Details

Year
2026
Journal
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Sample Size
n=39
Source
View article
Keep scrolling
More content below.
Up Next